Kenyon comes to end of road but IP boutique model not dead

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kenyon comes to end of road but IP boutique model not dead

kenyon logo 165

The news of Kenyon & Kenyon’s closure came the same week that Managing IP published a look back at the IP boutiques set up in the 1960s, some of whom continue to thrive today

This week came the news that Houston-based Andrews Kurth will add the 55 remaining lawyers at Kenyon & Kenyon. 

kenyon logo

This in effect signals a sad end for a firm whose proud history stretches back to 1879. The shell of the company will be wound down.

As the Wall Street Journal noted in an interesting article following the announcement, Kenyon is the latest in a string of IP boutiques to close in recent years.

“In 2005, for instance, Ropes & Gray LLP acquired then-prominent intellectual-property firm Fish & Neave,” said the Journal. “By then, two other stalwarts in the field, New York’s Pennie & Edmonds and Los Angeles-based Lyon & Lyon LLP, had both gone bust, with lawyers decamping to other firms. Several smaller intellectual-property firms have been acquired or dissolved more recently, including Morgan & Finnegan LLP, whose lawyers joined Locke Lord LLP in 2009.”

With this latest deal, another storied firm is about to disappear – although the Kenyon name will live on through the new Andrews Kurth Kenyon name for the IP and technology practice – but this does not mean the end for the IP boutiques.

As the Wall Street Journal noted, some IP firms have managed to stay independent. This includes 370-lawyer Fish & Richardson, 350-lawyer Finnegan Henderson Farabow & Dunner, and 280-lawyer Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear.

Mad Men cover

The demise of Kenyon does suggest, however, that size is critical. Steven Nataupsky, managing partner at Knobbe, told the Journal: “I think those midsize (intellectual property) firms, if not balanced, have really struggled.”

The news came the same week that Managing IP published our latest cover story, on a number of boutique firms set up in the 1960s that would transform the market. Many of these still exist today, showing that the IP boutique model is still viable.

These firms include the firms now known as Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, Bereskin & Parr, Finnegan, Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt, and Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu.

The piece includes a look back at the circumstances that allowed these firms to crop up. They struggled at first, however, before reaching the critical mass that would allow them to survive. 




more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Shem Otanga discusses the importance of curiosity and passion, and why he would have loved to have been a professional recording artist
Practitioners say the Bombay High Court shouldn’t have refused well-known trademark recognition for TikTok simply because the app is banned in India
In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Novo Nordisk losing patent rights covering Ozempic in Canada and a US Supreme Court decision favouring Ed Sheeran were also among the top talking points
The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Developments included a stay in a row concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction and a timeline for the rollout of the long-awaited new CMS
Jorg Thomaier, who has been head of IP at the German pharma company since 2010, will leave later this year and hand the reins to the company’s head of patents
Companies must conduct thorough IP due diligence – even if it may not be mandatory
Gift this article