France: Does Kadjar refer to the Iranian dynasty or to the new Renault crossover?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Does Kadjar refer to the Iranian dynasty or to the new Renault crossover?

Karim Kadjar, an actor and descendant of the Iranian Kadjar dynasty which reigned over Iran from 1786 to 1925, did not appreciate the adoption by the French company Renault of the name Kadjar as a trade mark and keyword on internet search engines for designating its new crossover utility vehicle.

Indeed, in January 2015, Renault launched its new crossover with French and European trade marks for Kadjar in class 12 for "vehicles".

Consequently, Karim Kadjar filed a cancellation action against the French trade mark Kadjar (number 144065320) before the Tribunal de Grande Instance (TGI) in March 2015 based on Aticle L711-4 of the French IP Code which states that "a mark may not be adopted if it infringes earlier rights including… g) the personality rights of a third party including his surname…" and on provisions of general civil law (Articles 9 and 1382 of the Civil Code).

The question is whether there is a risk of confusion or a risk of association for the relevant public, which is the average French consumer of vehicles, between the trade mark and this family name and if the surname Kadjar was famous when the trade mark was filed.

The TGI issued a decision on June 9 2016 considering that, on the filing date of the trade mark, despite the important volume of evidence, the family name has a limited reputation in France, except for a very specific public interested in Iranian history.

Therefore, in the absence of reputation of this family name, there is no likelihood of confusion for the relevant consumer.

Is this trade mark deceptive ?

Karim Kadjar considers that the trade mark misleads the consumer, who may consider that the goods are manufactured in Iran or with the heirs' authorisation. The French TGI also rejects this argument, considering that there is no risk of confusion, and therefore the consumer cannot be deceived, due to the lack of notoriety of this family name.

At this stage, Renault can continue the sale of its Renault Kadjar.

Nevertheless this is a reminder that it is important to conduct searches and check the possible notoriety of a family name before adopting a new trade mark consisting of a family name.

ingrid.jpg

Ingrid Corviole-Parent


Gevers & Ores41, avenue de FriedlandParis 75008, FranceTel: +33 1 45 00 48 48Fax: +33 1 40 67 95 67paris@gevers.euwww.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of Health Hoglund joining Sisvel and the Delhi High Court staying a $2.2 million decree in favour of Philips were also among the top talking points
The firm is continuing its aggressive IP hiring streak with the addition of partner Matthew Rizzolo
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
New partners, including the firm’s first female head of a department, are eyeing a deeper focus on client understanding
Chunguang Hu of China PAT explains why his ‘insider’ experience as a patent examiner benefits clients and why he wants to debunk the myth that IP has limited value in China
Essenese Obhan shares his expansion plans and vision of creating a ‘one-stop shop’ for clients after Indian firms Obhan & Associates and Mason & Associates joined forces
From AI and the UPC to troublesome trademarks in China, experts name the IP trends likely to dominate 2026
Colm Murphy says he is keen to help clients navigate cross-border IP challenges in Europe
With 2025 behind us, US practitioners sit down with Managing IP to discuss the major IP moments from the year and what to expect in 2026
Large-scale transatlantic mergers will give US entities a strong foothold at the UPC, and could spark further fragmentation of European patent practices
Gift this article