Spain: The utility model alternative

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: The utility model alternative

A utility model can be obtained in Spain for inventions relating to products, not methods, and for a term of 10 years.

The requirements to be met by a utility model in Spain are slightly different to the requirements to be met by a patent. Both rights require that the subject matter of the invention must be new and must involve an inventive step, but the meaning of inventive step is different for patents and utility models.

In the case of patents, an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in an evident way from the state of the art, while in the case of utility models an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in a very evident way from the state of the art.

This distinction between evident and very evident implies that if the invention incorporates a small improvement, not too inventive, it would be advisable to file a utility model application. This means that we can obtain stronger protection in Spain for a small improvement by filing a utility model, instead of filing a patent application.

Furthermore a utility model application does not require a search report nor an examination on patentability of the invention, unlike a patent application. This implies that there is no need to pay a search fee nor an examination fee. The invention is only examined on patentability requirements if an opposition is filed by a third party.

The new Spanish Patent Act that will come into force in 2017 includes some changes concerning enforceability of utility models. The main novelty with respect to the current law is that a search report must be requested to the Spanish Patent Office only if the owner of the utility model wishes to enforce his or her rights against a third party.

We might also say that the prosecution of a utility model application is quicker than the prosecution of a patent application. It only takes less than one month to be published and only five months to be granted if no opposition is filed. The prosecution is therefore quicker than the prosecution of a patent application which takes more than three years.

To sum up, we should say that if you need to protect a product invention in Spain in a quick, easy and cheap manner, we recommend you to proceed with a utility model application.

Castilla

Gabriel Castilla


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article