Spain: The utility model alternative

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: The utility model alternative

A utility model can be obtained in Spain for inventions relating to products, not methods, and for a term of 10 years.

The requirements to be met by a utility model in Spain are slightly different to the requirements to be met by a patent. Both rights require that the subject matter of the invention must be new and must involve an inventive step, but the meaning of inventive step is different for patents and utility models.

In the case of patents, an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in an evident way from the state of the art, while in the case of utility models an invention involves inventive step when it does not derive in a very evident way from the state of the art.

This distinction between evident and very evident implies that if the invention incorporates a small improvement, not too inventive, it would be advisable to file a utility model application. This means that we can obtain stronger protection in Spain for a small improvement by filing a utility model, instead of filing a patent application.

Furthermore a utility model application does not require a search report nor an examination on patentability of the invention, unlike a patent application. This implies that there is no need to pay a search fee nor an examination fee. The invention is only examined on patentability requirements if an opposition is filed by a third party.

The new Spanish Patent Act that will come into force in 2017 includes some changes concerning enforceability of utility models. The main novelty with respect to the current law is that a search report must be requested to the Spanish Patent Office only if the owner of the utility model wishes to enforce his or her rights against a third party.

We might also say that the prosecution of a utility model application is quicker than the prosecution of a patent application. It only takes less than one month to be published and only five months to be granted if no opposition is filed. The prosecution is therefore quicker than the prosecution of a patent application which takes more than three years.

To sum up, we should say that if you need to protect a product invention in Spain in a quick, easy and cheap manner, we recommend you to proceed with a utility model application.

Castilla

Gabriel Castilla


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article