UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

The results of the EPO's recently published Patent Filings Survey illustrate that the European patent is more popular than ever, with this upwards trend predicted to continue. A detailed study of the survey reveals that the strong growth in filings at the European Patent Office is driven by increased patent filing activity in both the UK and China, alongside a continued rise in other major territories.

Any increase in European patent filings is obviously associated with a concomitant increase in the workload of the EPO. As such, accelerating the prosecution of a patent application through the EPO is likely to become a more frequent client request.

In the case of Euro-PCT applications, accelerated examination under PACE may be requested at any time. However, for the request to be as effective as possible it should be made upon entry into the European phase, or together with any response to the WO-ISA, IPER or SISR required under Rule 161(1) EPC.

To further accelerate prosecution, an applicant may waive the right to a communication pursuant to Rule 161(1) or (2) and 162, pay any claims fees due and, where required, submit a response under Rule 161(1) upon entry into the European phase. Any request for accelerated examination at this time will encompass the formalities examination, the supplementary European search report and/or substantive examination as applicable.

It is important to note that accelerated examination of an application will cease if any request for an extension of time for response is made to the EPO. Additionally, accelerated examination may only be requested once per application, thus any re-entry into the accelerated examination procedure before the EPO is not possible.

Finally, accelerated examination will be suspended if any renewal fees due before the EPO are not paid before their initial due date. Here, any application may be returned to accelerated prosecution with the payment of the renewal fee within the six-month grace period.

Accelerated prosecution provides an excellent means of ensuring the timely prosecution of pending European patent applications. However, it is essential the intricacies of the system are fully understood to achieve the best results for attorneys and clients alike.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Law firms are integrating AI to remain competitive, and some are noticing an impact on traditional training and billing models
Intellectual property, M&A and competition partners are also advising on the deal, which will see Netflix acquire the film and television studios of Warner Bros
Sheppard Mullin’s Jennifer Ayers reviews modifications to the rules of practice for IPR petitions and considers what practitioners need to know
News of the EUIPO launching a GI protection system, and WIPO publishing a review of the UDRP were also among the top talking points
A team from Addleshaw Goddard secured victory for the changing robe brand, following a trial against competitor D-Robe
Bird & Bird, Brinkhof and Bardehle Pagenberg were successful at the Court of Appeal, while there was a partial victory for Amazon in a case concerning audio recordings
Following the anniversary of Venner Shipley and AA Thornton's merger, Ian Gill recalls the initial trepidation about working for his spouse and offers tips for those who may find their personal and professional worlds colliding
Two partners have departed DLA Piper to join Squire Patton Boggs and Blank Rome in San Francisco and Chicago, respectively
Practitioners say a 32% rise in court fees is somewhat expected to maintain the UPC’s strong start, but some warn that SME clients could be squeezed out
Swati Sharma and Revanta Mathur at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas explain how they overcame IP office objections to secure victory for a tyre manufacturer
Gift this article