UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

The results of the EPO's recently published Patent Filings Survey illustrate that the European patent is more popular than ever, with this upwards trend predicted to continue. A detailed study of the survey reveals that the strong growth in filings at the European Patent Office is driven by increased patent filing activity in both the UK and China, alongside a continued rise in other major territories.

Any increase in European patent filings is obviously associated with a concomitant increase in the workload of the EPO. As such, accelerating the prosecution of a patent application through the EPO is likely to become a more frequent client request.

In the case of Euro-PCT applications, accelerated examination under PACE may be requested at any time. However, for the request to be as effective as possible it should be made upon entry into the European phase, or together with any response to the WO-ISA, IPER or SISR required under Rule 161(1) EPC.

To further accelerate prosecution, an applicant may waive the right to a communication pursuant to Rule 161(1) or (2) and 162, pay any claims fees due and, where required, submit a response under Rule 161(1) upon entry into the European phase. Any request for accelerated examination at this time will encompass the formalities examination, the supplementary European search report and/or substantive examination as applicable.

It is important to note that accelerated examination of an application will cease if any request for an extension of time for response is made to the EPO. Additionally, accelerated examination may only be requested once per application, thus any re-entry into the accelerated examination procedure before the EPO is not possible.

Finally, accelerated examination will be suspended if any renewal fees due before the EPO are not paid before their initial due date. Here, any application may be returned to accelerated prosecution with the payment of the renewal fee within the six-month grace period.

Accelerated prosecution provides an excellent means of ensuring the timely prosecution of pending European patent applications. However, it is essential the intricacies of the system are fully understood to achieve the best results for attorneys and clients alike.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Jan Phillip Rektorschek, founding partner at Pentarc in Germany, explains why the firm broke away from Taylor Wessing and discusses its plans for staying competitive
Royal Mail Group wins copyright and database right infringement case, in a dispute that can be linked to the history of postcodes in the UK
Managing partner Mark O’Donnell explains why people are at the centre of the Australian outfit’s investment focus and how being independent benefits the firm
IP is becoming one of the most significant drivers of major deals, and law firms are altering their practices to reflect the change
In the second in a new podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IPause, a network set up to support those experiencing (peri)menopause
Firms are adapting litigation strategy as Brazil’s unique legal system and technical expertise have made preliminary injunctions a key tool in global patent disputes
A ruling on confidentiality by the the England and Wales Court of Appeal and an intervention from the US government in the InterDigital v Disney litigation were also among top talking points
Moore & Van Allen hires former Teva counsel Larry Rickles to help expand the firm’s life sciences capabilities
Canadian law firms should avoid ‘tunnel vision’ as exclusive survey reveals client dissatisfaction with risk management advice and value-added services
In major recent developments, the CoA ruled on director liability for patent infringement, and Nokia targeted Paramount at the UPC and in Germany
Gift this article