Mediation in practice

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mediation in practice

A formidable panel of trademark experts took the stage for Sunday’s mock mediation session. On one side were Miles J. Alexander of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton in the U.S. and Daniel R. Bereskin of Bereskin & Parr in Canada. Opposing them were Louis T. Pirkey of Pirkey Barber and Lori A. Ball of Molson Coors. Driving the parties towards an agreement was moderator Leslie J. Lott of Lott & Fischer in the U.S.

The lawyers were reenacting a real case concerning the Homeaway and Homesaway marks in a realistic portrayal of a mediation that featured opening statements, joint sessions between the parties, private caucuses and the occasional sarcastic comment (such as “They say it’s not extortion. We know better”).

The session was introduced by James M. Amend, who also provided a commentary on some of the action and decisions. He noted how ­moderator Lott “focused on the driving forces behind a potential settlement” by getting the parties to set out terms first, before deciding on a dollar figure. In the end, the moderator provided a suggested figure confidentially to each party, which they both accepted.

Lott emphasized that focusing on what is “fair” in a mediation may not always be helpful, and it is important to remind the parties of that: “Peace may be more important to the parties than fairness.” Following the mock mediation, the speakers revealed that the real case that inspired the session had been resolved in voluntary mediation to the satisfaction of both parties in 2007, and that both companies had gone on to be successful.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Firms with established sports relationships and specialised expertise are well positioned to capture the market’s expanded pool of IP work
Gunjan Paharia discusses developing RIA, an AI platform built to draw on decades of institutional knowledge, support junior lawyers, and reshape how legal teams work
A strong Canadian business helped lift profits, but the IP service group's latest results underline the pressure facing its operations in Australia, New Zealand and parts of Asia
Wins in court have been key to the six-year-old firm’s growth, as one of its founders explains
The firm’s co-CEO discusses patent litigation, collaboration with overseas colleagues and the next generation of leaders
Two recent decisions demonstrate the courts’ creativity in cutting-edge IP disputes that tested their jurisdictional powers
Aditi Verma Thakur, managing partner at Aishani Partners, discusses 5 am wake-ups, working with high-performing professionals and staying calm under pressure
After more than three decades at Wilson Sonsini, Ian Edvalson explains why he moved to expand his life sciences transactional practice
Gift this article