WIPO welcomes Madrid comments

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

WIPO welcomes Madrid comments

How should the Madrid System develop? That was the question posed by David Muls, Senior Director of WIPO’s Madrid Registry, Brands and Designs Sector, at Sunday’s Madrid System Users Meeting

On its 125th anniversary, WIPO is considering how the Madrid System will look in the future and the Secretariat will submit a paper to the next session of the Working Group on the Legal Development of the Madrid System, which takes place in June this year.

The Madrid System was founded in 1891 but has continued to develop since then, for example with the introduction of the Madrid Protocol in 1989. “We have to keep thinking about how the System should evolve,” Muls told the INTA Daily News. Asked how the System rated today, he said: “Our clients are pleased but we feel there is always room for improvement.”

Today, changes are partly being driven by the increasing number and range of jurisdictions covered by the system, as more members join including regional systems such as EUIPO and OAPI. The growing use of technology is also playing a part, says Muls, and so are users’ demands: “Users seek simplified processes to navigate the system. We have to consider how we can make it accessible while maintaining the quality of the output.”

During Sunday’s meeting, Muls also provided an update on filing trends and recent accessions to the Madrid System, as well as new electronic tools. Gregoire Bisson, Director of the Hague Registry, provided an update on design developments.

There was also a discussion on better use of the Madrid System, focusing on class headings in International Registrations. This was moderated by Asta Valdimarsdóttir, Director, Operations Division, Madrid Registry, Brands and Designs Sector, and included Yang Guoming, Deputy Director, International Registration Division, Trademark Office, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (SAIC), Jennifer Chicoski, Administrator, Trademark Examination Policy and Procedure USPTO, and Julio Laporta, Deputy Director, Operations Department EUIPO.

WIPO yesterday released the new Madrid Monitor database, which will serve as the primary search tool for international registrations. The new search tool integrates in one application functionalities and information accessible through ROMARIN, the WIPO Gazette of International Marks, Madrid E-Alert and Real-Time Status. WIPO is demonstrating Madrid Monitor at its booth in the Exhibition Hall.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article