WIPO welcomes Madrid comments

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

WIPO welcomes Madrid comments

How should the Madrid System develop? That was the question posed by David Muls, Senior Director of WIPO’s Madrid Registry, Brands and Designs Sector, at Sunday’s Madrid System Users Meeting

On its 125th anniversary, WIPO is considering how the Madrid System will look in the future and the Secretariat will submit a paper to the next session of the Working Group on the Legal Development of the Madrid System, which takes place in June this year.

The Madrid System was founded in 1891 but has continued to develop since then, for example with the introduction of the Madrid Protocol in 1989. “We have to keep thinking about how the System should evolve,” Muls told the INTA Daily News. Asked how the System rated today, he said: “Our clients are pleased but we feel there is always room for improvement.”

Today, changes are partly being driven by the increasing number and range of jurisdictions covered by the system, as more members join including regional systems such as EUIPO and OAPI. The growing use of technology is also playing a part, says Muls, and so are users’ demands: “Users seek simplified processes to navigate the system. We have to consider how we can make it accessible while maintaining the quality of the output.”

During Sunday’s meeting, Muls also provided an update on filing trends and recent accessions to the Madrid System, as well as new electronic tools. Gregoire Bisson, Director of the Hague Registry, provided an update on design developments.

There was also a discussion on better use of the Madrid System, focusing on class headings in International Registrations. This was moderated by Asta Valdimarsdóttir, Director, Operations Division, Madrid Registry, Brands and Designs Sector, and included Yang Guoming, Deputy Director, International Registration Division, Trademark Office, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (SAIC), Jennifer Chicoski, Administrator, Trademark Examination Policy and Procedure USPTO, and Julio Laporta, Deputy Director, Operations Department EUIPO.

WIPO yesterday released the new Madrid Monitor database, which will serve as the primary search tool for international registrations. The new search tool integrates in one application functionalities and information accessible through ROMARIN, the WIPO Gazette of International Marks, Madrid E-Alert and Real-Time Status. WIPO is demonstrating Madrid Monitor at its booth in the Exhibition Hall.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article