Preview: Monitoring online platforms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Preview: Monitoring online platforms

Online platforms provide the opportunity for just about anyone to sell a product or service, without the resources required for brick-and-mortar commerce. That provides sellers of counterfeit and contraband goods with the perfect hiding place: in plain sight, among countless others, and isolated from the in-person scrutiny of a potential buyer.

Estimates suggest that 60% of all counterfeit goods are sold online, and brand owners essentially have two courses of action available to them: “Follow the protocols of the IP protection policies that all of the platforms have, or pursue and confront counterfeiters and start legal actions,” according to Virginia Cervieri of Cervieri Monsuárez & Associates in Uruguay, who will moderate a panel, CT21, on online enforcement on Tuesday. Many brand owners choose “cooperation” with e-commerce platform providers over “confrontation,” Cervieri says.

Tuesday’s panel will feature speakers from Tommy Hilfiger, Adidas, Luxottica and Levi Strauss, who will present three cases demonstrating their coordination with popular platforms—Facebook, Alibaba and MercadoLibre. Each of these e-commerce platforms has policies to prohibit the sale of counterfeit goods and prevent IP infringement on their sites (as do most), but infringers can and do slip through. Once these counterfeit products are on the sites, “the brand owners, in my opinion, have all of the work,” Cervieri says.

“They have to monitor, notify the platforms and then wait for removal, which can take sometimes almost a week,” says Cervieri.

While the platforms do have policies in place, they are not proactive and place too much of the burden on brand owners, she adds. “The only other option available to brand owners is to confront individual infringers themselves and begin legal action. Neither option is efficient.”

The questions that will be addressed in the session, then, are: “Will the brand owners continue to cooperate, or will the platforms have to become more cooperative, and what are the common problems that brand owners are facing with these platforms?” says Cervieri.

CT21 Online Enforcement: Counterfeit Products, Contraband but Genuine Products, Parallel Imports is on Tuesday at 11:45

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article