Mexico: Coverage of class headings

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Coverage of class headings

It has recently become common in Mexico to be more specific with the descriptions of products and/or services when filing a trade mark application, making it more unusual to apply for the class headings.

This practice of applying for the class heading has changed due to the fact that the classification criterion at the Mexican Trademark Office (TMO) has become stricter. For example, certain general indications such as "parts and fittings" are required to be specified. Likewise phrases similar to "all goods in Class X" are no longer accepted by the TMO.

It has been interpreted that the class headings only cover the goods or services specifically mentioned in the each of the class headings and that all the general indications of a particular class heading does not means that all the goods in the class are included in the requested protection.

Before, it was a common practice to apply for the class headings and obtain broadest protection of goods and services since it was easier and a tactic to avoid unnecessary official actions from the examiner requesting to specify products, because it was understood that the class headings covered all goods/services included in the class even though they were not specifically designated in the description.

Now, the practice is the contrary: a trade mark registered for the class heading is understood to cover the exact goods/services listed or any product or service that could be logically interpreted as falling under the literal meaning of the class heading.

In any event, the detailed alphabetical list of goods and services should be consulted to determine the precise classification of each product or service for which the mark is to be registered in Mexico and also in order to permit the TMO examiners to define or accept the extent of protection as described and to try to avoid unnecessary classification requirements.

sada

Camen Sada


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article