Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Under the previous rules applicable regarding registrability of a trade mark in Greece, a consent letter could admissibly be filed only before the Trade Marks Administrative Commission, not at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts, following the rejection of the trade mark application concerned, provided that (1) the trade marks under comparison are not identical, (2) the consent at issue is not contrary to the public interest and (3) there is no serious danger of the average consumer being deceived.

The good news is that under the rules now applicable (as of April 11 2012) consent letters may now be filed and unconditionally accepted even at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts. This is equally applicable to all trade mark applications regardless their filing date, that is before or after the new rules came into force.

End of the story? Not yet. There is a line of case law, which although not prevailing, favours the view that as regards trade mark applications (either national applications or IRs designating Greece) filed before April 11 2012, consent letters may be admissibly filed before the administrative courts, which will nevertheless take them into consideration in light of conditions (1) to (3) mentioned above. This in practice means that even if a consent letter is filed, the trade mark application may still be found not registrable on these grounds.

There are so far four judgments of the Administrative Court of Appeals favouring the unconditional acceptance of consent letters and two favouring the above-mentioned stiff approach. This definitely means that the issue will sooner or later be litigated before the Council of the State (the Greek Administrative Supreme Court).

Until then, the story is not finished and it seems that trade mark applicants should be prepared for a hard battle.

Manolis Metaxakis


Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210 7222889info@patrinoskilimiris.comwww.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm said revenue from its ‘refreshed and expanded’ IP team increased by 4% in FY25
As revenue reporting season hits full stride, firms have made a point of highlighting the successes of their IP teams as they take centre stage in big-ticket work
GSK and CureVac will together receive $740 million, as well as royalties on sales of COVID-19 vaccines in the US
The firm, which represented Getty in one of the most closely followed copyright cases in recent years, said IP was among its standout practice areas
The decision to divide was partly due to differing visions over the impact of technology on IP work, according to one partner
The Bar Council of India’s warning to Dentons Link Legal and CMS IndusLaw shows why foreign firms are right to worry about India’s legal market
News of a trade secrets leak involving TSMC and an action in Japan against AI startup Perplexity were also among the top talking points
Rothwell Figg partner Leo Loughlin discusses the importance of pro bono work and why ‘For the Kids’ should not be monopolised for trademark purposes
A new consultancy firm, set up by a former Warner Bros and Netflix lawyer, aims to resolve tensions between AI developers and the creative industries
Raúl Rubio, partner at Pérez-Llorca, outlines the firm’s AI initiatives and says solutions for law firms have yet to reach the required level of sophistication
Gift this article