Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Under the previous rules applicable regarding registrability of a trade mark in Greece, a consent letter could admissibly be filed only before the Trade Marks Administrative Commission, not at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts, following the rejection of the trade mark application concerned, provided that (1) the trade marks under comparison are not identical, (2) the consent at issue is not contrary to the public interest and (3) there is no serious danger of the average consumer being deceived.

The good news is that under the rules now applicable (as of April 11 2012) consent letters may now be filed and unconditionally accepted even at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts. This is equally applicable to all trade mark applications regardless their filing date, that is before or after the new rules came into force.

End of the story? Not yet. There is a line of case law, which although not prevailing, favours the view that as regards trade mark applications (either national applications or IRs designating Greece) filed before April 11 2012, consent letters may be admissibly filed before the administrative courts, which will nevertheless take them into consideration in light of conditions (1) to (3) mentioned above. This in practice means that even if a consent letter is filed, the trade mark application may still be found not registrable on these grounds.

There are so far four judgments of the Administrative Court of Appeals favouring the unconditional acceptance of consent letters and two favouring the above-mentioned stiff approach. This definitely means that the issue will sooner or later be litigated before the Council of the State (the Greek Administrative Supreme Court).

Until then, the story is not finished and it seems that trade mark applicants should be prepared for a hard battle.

Manolis Metaxakis


Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210 7222889info@patrinoskilimiris.comwww.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
A decision finding Google liable for trademark infringement and the launch of a new IP services group were also among the top talking points
Law firms across the world are seemingly united in their reluctance to give juniors a chance, which shouldn’t be the case
In-house counsel say they want more visibility for the next generation of lawyers, but private practice practitioners believe jurisdictional challenges stand in their way
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals this year’s first rankings, showing how firms in Asia-Pacific are performing across a range of practice areas
A dispute over buggies, a decision on the UPC’s jurisdiction, and the formal launch of the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre were among the top developments
Sofie McPherson says she is excited to work at a firm that offers an integrated approach between attorneys and litigators
Personality rights are among several measures the government must take to maximise the potential of the music licensing market, say lawyers
Pascal Faure, director general of INPI, explains why keeping a cool head is key, and discusses plans to leverage IP assets to secure funding
Gift this article