Argentina: Image rights in the new Civil and Commercial Code

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Image rights in the new Civil and Commercial Code

As we have explained in previous briefings, the new Argentine Civil and Commercial Code contains several sections that refer, both directly and indirectly, to intellectual property matters.

For example, the new code addresses in section 53 the subject of right to the image, and it does so in terms similar to those of section 31 of law 11,723 (Intellectual Property Law).

The right to the image has double content:

  • A positive aspect: the holder's right to authorise the publication and reproduction of his or her image, and from a more general perspective, to obtain an image-related economic profit.

  • A negative aspect: the right to prohibit third parties from obtaining and publishing one's own image.

The above-mentioned Section 53 of the new code is broader than Section 31, because while the latter refers exclusively to the portrait (although both doctrine and case-law had widened their scope when interpreting it), the new section now includes any registration: visual, auditory or audiovisual.

It arises from Section 53 that the holder's consent is required not only for the reproduction or publication of the image or the voice, but also for the capturing thereof.

Another significant difference compared with the previous text is that as the new regulation does not foresee the expression "it may not be commercialised", any capturing effected without the holder's consent, whether or not it is placed in commerce, will be illegal.

zuccherino.jpg

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
A cross-practice team from Mayer Brown, which included members of the firm’s IP practice, advised on the deal
María Cecilia Romoleroux discusses the challenges she has faced in her career in IP and how she hopes to improve things for the next generation of women
Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Gift this article