Goodlatte reintroduces Innovation Act

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Goodlatte reintroduces Innovation Act

Bob Goodlatte has introduced the Innovation Act, which is the same legislation that passed the US House of Representatives in December 2013, aimed at tackling abusive patent litigation

us-congress.jpg

Goodlatte, who is the House Judiciary Committee Chairman, introduced the bill along with Representatives Peter DeFazio, Darrell Issa, Jerrold Nadler, Lamar Smith, Zoe Logren and Anna Eshoo.

Goodlatte commented:“In recent years, we have seen an exponential increase in the use of weak or poorly granted patents by patent trolls to file numerous patent infringement lawsuits against American businesses with the hope of securing a quick payday. American businesses small and large are being forced to spend valuable resources on litigation rather than on innovating and growing their businesses.

“With our current patent laws being abused in ways that are threatening the survival of American innovation, the Congress must act to curb abusive patent litigation.”

The provisions of the Innovation Act include:

• Requiring plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation.

• Requiring plaintiffs to explain why they are suing a company in their court pleadings.

• Requiring courts to make decisions about whether a patent is valid or invalid early in the litigation process so that patent trolls cannot drag patent cases on for years based on invalid claims.

• Requiring judges to award attorneys’ fees to the victims of the frivolous lawsuit when parties bring lawsuits or claims that have no reasonable basis in law or fact. The bill allows judges to waive the award of attorneys’ fees in special circumstances. This provision applies to both plaintiffs and defendants who file frivolous claims.

• Requiring the Judicial Conference to make rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, “so that patent trolls cannot use the high costs of discovery to extort money from small businesses and entrepreneurs”.

• Creating a voluntary process for small businesses to postpone expensive patent lawsuits while their larger sellers complete similar patent lawsuits against the same plaintiffs, to protect customers who simply bought the product off-the-shelf.

• Requiring the USPTO to provide educational resources for those facing abusive patent litigation claims.

The Innovation Act previously passed the House of Representatives in the 113th Congress by a vote of 325-91.

The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) noted that the bill provides another opportunity to consider and discuss the important issues addressed in Goodlatte's legislation.

AIPLA Executive Director Lisa Jorgenson commented that "the attention to these issues reflects the interest and effort of the House of Representatives and the Senate to both improve the US patent system and deal with concerns regarding certain abusive litigation behavior. We look forward to continuing to work together with Congress toward a goal of ensuring that any legislation strikes the right balance between restraining abusive behavior while not impairing the legitimate rights of patent owners."

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As international interest in Southeast Asia grows, Sheng Rong Tng discusses how changing client demands and the firm’s multidisciplinary model are helping it compete for complex regional mandates
Todd Hopfinger, director in Sterne Kessler’s electronics practice group, says IP owners are contemplating how patent rights will be enforced as commercial activity expands beyond Earth
Christopher Stothers' arrival strengthens the firm's life sciences, technology and UPC offering as competition for top European litigators intensifies
Armstrong Teasdale’s Jim Heinen Jr discusses the challenge of balancing billables, business development and family life and explains why not all patent lawyers are science nerds
From cross-border jurisdiction to the end of the transitional period, Powell Gilbert’s Ioana Sabau and Bryce Matthewson predict the biggest talking points ahead
A wave of office launches and lateral hires reflect the draw of patent disputes, but booming AI, semiconductor and data centre markets are offering an even bigger IP opportunity
The hire of Frederick Nicolle as a partner continues Pinsent Masons' expansion while reducing Simmons’ patent prosecution offering in London to zero
The expansion into Granada forms part of a national ‘decentralisation’ strategy focused on providing proximity to research and tech businesses away from traditional hubs
Three successive wins have got the firm eyeing additional opportunities as ITC work booms
While many firms remain focused on generative AI, recent hires and practice launches suggest the next battle may be for lawyers who understand how AI is moving into the physical world
Gift this article