Goodlatte reintroduces Innovation Act

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Goodlatte reintroduces Innovation Act

Bob Goodlatte has introduced the Innovation Act, which is the same legislation that passed the US House of Representatives in December 2013, aimed at tackling abusive patent litigation

us-congress.jpg

Goodlatte, who is the House Judiciary Committee Chairman, introduced the bill along with Representatives Peter DeFazio, Darrell Issa, Jerrold Nadler, Lamar Smith, Zoe Logren and Anna Eshoo.

Goodlatte commented:“In recent years, we have seen an exponential increase in the use of weak or poorly granted patents by patent trolls to file numerous patent infringement lawsuits against American businesses with the hope of securing a quick payday. American businesses small and large are being forced to spend valuable resources on litigation rather than on innovating and growing their businesses.

“With our current patent laws being abused in ways that are threatening the survival of American innovation, the Congress must act to curb abusive patent litigation.”

The provisions of the Innovation Act include:

• Requiring plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation.

• Requiring plaintiffs to explain why they are suing a company in their court pleadings.

• Requiring courts to make decisions about whether a patent is valid or invalid early in the litigation process so that patent trolls cannot drag patent cases on for years based on invalid claims.

• Requiring judges to award attorneys’ fees to the victims of the frivolous lawsuit when parties bring lawsuits or claims that have no reasonable basis in law or fact. The bill allows judges to waive the award of attorneys’ fees in special circumstances. This provision applies to both plaintiffs and defendants who file frivolous claims.

• Requiring the Judicial Conference to make rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, “so that patent trolls cannot use the high costs of discovery to extort money from small businesses and entrepreneurs”.

• Creating a voluntary process for small businesses to postpone expensive patent lawsuits while their larger sellers complete similar patent lawsuits against the same plaintiffs, to protect customers who simply bought the product off-the-shelf.

• Requiring the USPTO to provide educational resources for those facing abusive patent litigation claims.

The Innovation Act previously passed the House of Representatives in the 113th Congress by a vote of 325-91.

The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) noted that the bill provides another opportunity to consider and discuss the important issues addressed in Goodlatte's legislation.

AIPLA Executive Director Lisa Jorgenson commented that "the attention to these issues reflects the interest and effort of the House of Representatives and the Senate to both improve the US patent system and deal with concerns regarding certain abusive litigation behavior. We look forward to continuing to work together with Congress toward a goal of ensuring that any legislation strikes the right balance between restraining abusive behavior while not impairing the legitimate rights of patent owners."

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article