How China is changing

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How China is changing

Ten years ago, when I was Asia editor for Managing IP in Hong Kong, discussions about IP in China focused almost entirely on counterfeiting: the scale of it, how to stop it and whether the country would develop a culture of indigenous innovation

There are still plenty of fakes of course, but the debate has moved on. Foreign companies have become better at understanding the rules and procedures for protecting their rights in China and many are focusing their attention on responding to the rise of the country’s home-grown - but expansionary – businesses.

diana-sternfeld.jpg

Another change has been improvements in China’s judicial system. At last week’s Women's Leadership Forum in London, Rouse’s Diana Sternfeld (right) said that her firm has litigated more than 1,000 IP cases in the country.

What has changed over time, she explained, is that China’s courts are now trying much harder to understand cases. She recounted how one judge had accompanied a raid to see how the defendants operated their counterfeiting business so as to understand the case better.

But as confidence in the courts is growing, so is demand for their services. IP disputes involving a foreign party make up a very small proportion of cases brought before Chinese judges: thousands more involve Chinese rivals.

That confidence has a downside: with courts so busy, many judges will look for opportunities to reduce their backlog and reject cases on procedural irregularities that seem trivial – and infuriating – to foreign IP owners. GE’s Catriona Hammer, for example, recalled one notary refusing to notarize a document prepared by a colleague in Sweden because it had been signed using a ballpoint pen rather than a fountain pen.

While it may not come as much comfort to IP litigants perplexed by China’s procedural red tape, the practical constraints they face may, in part, reflect a changing judicial system in which parties have increasing confidence.

For more on litigation in China, see Peter Leung's interview with Judge Chen Jinchuan, vice president of the new Beijing IP Court, in our latest issue (subscription or free trial required).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Royal Mail Group wins copyright and database right infringement case, in a dispute that can be linked to the history of postcodes in the UK
Managing partner Mark O’Donnell explains why people are at the centre of the Australian outfit’s investment focus and how being independent benefits the firm
IP is becoming one of the most significant drivers of major deals, and law firms are altering their practices to reflect the change
In the second in a new podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IPause, a network set up to support those experiencing (peri)menopause
Firms are adapting litigation strategy as Brazil’s unique legal system and technical expertise have made preliminary injunctions a key tool in global patent disputes
A ruling on confidentiality by the the England and Wales Court of Appeal and an intervention from the US government in the InterDigital v Disney litigation were also among top talking points
Moore & Van Allen hires former Teva counsel Larry Rickles to help expand the firm’s life sciences capabilities
Canadian law firms should avoid ‘tunnel vision’ as exclusive survey reveals client dissatisfaction with risk management advice and value-added services
In major recent developments, the CoA ruled on director liability for patent infringement, and Nokia targeted Paramount at the UPC and in Germany
Niri Shan, the newly appointed head of IP for UK, Ireland and the Middle East, explains why the firm’s international setup has brought UPC success, and addresses German partner departures
Gift this article