Legislative overhauls, injunctions and patent eligibility in Canada

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Legislative overhauls, injunctions and patent eligibility in Canada

Canada flag 100

We recently published a supplement looking at some of the biggest issues facing IP practitioners in Canada

canada20flag.jpg

Managing IP has published a supplement on Canada, looking at some of the biggest issues facing the country’s IP system

Canada is undergoing some profound changes, the most prominent of which is the biggest overhaul of its Trademarks Act in 60 years. Recent legislative tweaks have also been made to the Copyright Act, Patent Act and Industrial Design Act, as well as the Combating Counterfeit Products Act.

In addition to analysing these legislative trends, the supplement also looks at two other important topics in Canada: injunctions in the age of the internet and patent eligibility.

Click on the headlines below to read articles from the supplement.

Some hard Acts to follow

IP practitioners in Canada have had their work cut out keeping on top of the barrage of legislative changes that have come their way in the past two years. Now the challenge is to implement them, reports Michael Loney

Canadian injunctions in the age of the internet

Bradley White, Vincent de Grandpré and Brad Jenkins of Osler discuss what the rise of the internet and the scope for online presence has meant for jurisdictional borders when enforcing IP rights

From antibodies to X-rays: an overview of patent eligibility in Canada

The trend for deciding patentability based on subject-matter eligibility is growing. David Schwartz and Sanro Zlobec of Smart & Biggar look at the situation in Canada, where the relevant jurisprudence remains scant

In addition, further detail was recently given on the implementation of the Trademark Act amendments. It seems these will now occur in 2018, a longer wait than the 2016 or 2017 that the market generally assumed. You can read more on that here.

Since the supplement was published, the final details of the Trans-Pacific Partnership have been announced. Look out for our December/January issue cover story for full analysis of the agreement, including the implications for Canada. The story will be published next month. 

The TPP is causing a lot of concerns in Canada. Jim Balsillie, former co-CEO of Research in Motion, has slammed the deal. “I’m not a partisan actor, but I actually think this is the worst thing that the Harper government has done for Canada… I think in 10 years from now, we’ll call that the signature worst thing in policy that Canada’s ever done,” he told The Canadian Press.

A big change for Canada in the TPP would be changing the copyright protection to 70 years from 50 years.

Prominent digital rights blogger and professor Michael Geist has also been critical of the TPP. He says the implications for digital policies on copyright and privacy should command considerable attention.

“On those fronts, the agreement appears to be a major failure,” Geist wrote in a recent blog post. “Canadian negotiators adopted a defensive strategy by seeking to maintain existing national laws and doing little to extend Canadian policies to other countries. The result is a deal that the US has rightly promoted as ‘Made in America’.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
In-house counsel aren’t impressed with law firms’ international networks, but practitioners say they are crucial for business
Publication of the UPC’s annual report and adoption of the procedural rules of the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre were also among major developments
With the INTA Annual Meeting drawing to a close, we asked attendees for their top tips on how to close business after a meeting
Senior UK judges discussing the impact of AI on the judiciary, and the role of in-house IP lawyers during corporate transactions and carve-outs were among the top talking points
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Annual Meeting hears that IP firms are targeting hires with technical literacy in a fragmented landscape, and that those that build an online presence will distinguish themselves from the digital chaos
Gift this article