ARIPO opens for e-filing

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ARIPO opens for e-filing

The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) has begun accepting online applications, making it easier for IP owners to protect their trademark rights in the Organization’s 19 member states. Among its members are Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania and Zimbabwe.

Fernando dos Santos, Director General of ARIPO, told the INTA Daily News yesterday that the Organization has updated its ICT facilities and has been able to accept e-filing since March this year. The move online has been accompanied by changes to make it easier for users to access the ARIPO database of patents, trademarks and industrial designs registered throughout its member states.

“The system will grow,” said dos Santos. “The idea is that soon we will have a regional database so that users can access the databases of member states. That depends on member states uploading their gazettes, but as of now applicants can read the ARIPO gazette online. Access is free for users.”

IP owners will not be able to file IP rights directly with ARIPO if they are based outside of one of the Organization’s member states, however. Instead, they will need to file them via a local agent. But dos Santos said that they will be able to send their applications in digital format to their local representative, who can then pass them onto ARIPO quickly and efficiently.

The number of trademark applications filed with ARIPO is slowly rising, but is still low compared with the number of applications received by other offices across the world.

“We could do better, but the problem is across the continent, not just with ARIPO,” said the Director General. He explained how the Organization is working hard to build the capacity of IP offices in its member states. It has programs to train examiners and judges, sometimes in partnership with IP offices such as the USPTO.

Dos Santos said that ARIPO representatives had recently met with politicians from across its member states, to impress upon them the importance of IP rights to economic development.

“Legislation is very important but there is a lack of awareness among legislators. That means that IP laws get stuck in parliaments. We want lawmakers to treat IP as a priority and update their laws. In particular, we want to see the domestication of international protocols and legal instruments and specific provisions that make it clear that a trademark or patent granted through ARIPO has the same value as those granted nationally.”

He added: “The continent is rising but to have a better future, more innovation and creativity, we need an improved IP system.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article