Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

On March 26 2019, the European Parliament voted in favour of the new EU Copyright Directive for the digital single market. As 73% of young European internet users listen to music, watch TV series and films or play games online, one of the Copyright Directive's changes concerns how online content sharing services should deal with copyrighted content.

Now, platforms that rely on user-uploaded content are required to obtain an authorisation from rights holders to make copyrighted content available to the public.

In the absence of a deal, online content-sharing service providers may be held liable for unauthorised acts of communication to the public of copyright-protected works, unless they are able to demonstrate that they have made a real effort to obtain a licence and acted expeditiously to stop users from accessing unauthorised content. Online platforms of more than three years and with an annual turnover over EUR 10 million must also make best efforts to prevent future uploads of the notified works.

In Brazil, Law 12,965/14 stipulates that internet providers can only be held liable for damages resulting from content generated by third parties if, after a specific court order, they do not take any steps to make the infringing content unavailable in a timely manner.

However, this liability exemption depends on a specific legal provision, which so far has not been enacted. Accordingly, Brazilian courts have steadily been applying Brazilian Copyright Law and dismissing copyright infringement claims if, after communication, the internet provider has removed the infringing content from its platform or blocked access to it.

As seen with the EU's GDPR and a similar Brazilian law approved in August 2018, European laws can influence Brazilian policy. As a result, considering the fast-growing consumption of online content by Brazilians, it is very important to follow closely any discussions generated by Article 17 of the new EU Copyright Directive in Brazil and to consider how it may impact Brazilian lawmakers.

Daniel Law

Antonio Curvello

Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article