Greece: Clarity on colour combinations

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Clarity on colour combinations

It is quite encouraging for law practitioners in Greece that Greek IP specialised courts have managed to align national case law with EU case law on trademarks during the last decade, providing a tool for legal certainty.

A couple of years ago, the IP Specialised Division of the Court of Appeals in Athens delivered judgment No. 1702/2016 on a trademark infringement case where a colour combination was involved. It was held that the word marks under comparison were not confusingly similar. It was further ruled that the accompanying colour combination was not decisive, since the colour combination concerned was found to be descriptive of the relevant goods (over-the-counter pharmaceuticals).

Recently, the General Court was of the same view (T-261/17), when it ruled on a comparison between the same signs applying the same EU case law principle, according to which the public will not consider a descriptive element of a composite mark to be the distinctive and dominant element in the overall impression conveyed by that mark.

This provided a clear – though apparently not complete – answer to the claimant's/opponent's main argument that the figurative elements in the mark applied-for, particularly the combination and configuration of the colours green and white, have an independent distinctive character even if the word element is considered dominant.

It seems that while the competent authorities in each instance (EU and national) regarded the colour combination to be the earlier mark's colour configuration as well, the applicant argued that it used a colour combination in a specific configuration. Thus, what seems to be left unanswered is whether a prima facie descriptive colour combination may have distinctiveness, in cases where the specific colour configuration is not descriptive in and of itself.

The question becomes more intriguing, considering that the specific colour configuration has been registered as a trademark, the validity of which is not questioned.

metaxakis-manolis.jpg

Manolis Metaxakis


Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210 7222889info@patrinoskilimiris.comwww.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The four-partner addition includes A&O Shearman’s former co-head of global IP litigation
A settlement involving Disney and another ruling concerning a lawyer’s request for access to documents were also among the big developments
Merchant & Gould's managing partner explains why the firm launched a Boston office and why it brought on board a local boutique
The model covers court-guided settlements, submissions-led determination of infringement and validity issues, and provides leeway for the court to determine a FRAND rate during negotiations
Tie up between Belgium-based firms will create an outfit with almost 30 UPC representatives, and a tier one-ranked patent disputes team
Blank Rome’s launch in West Palm Beach, marked by the arrival of two IP partners, comes in response to rising demands from technology clients
Abion says it has brought on board Matt Serlin as its first US hire to meet client demand for ‘full circle’ trademark and domain name services
News of Health Hoglund joining Sisvel and the Delhi High Court staying a $2.2 million decree in favour of Philips were also among the top talking points
The firm is continuing its aggressive IP hiring streak with the addition of partner Matthew Rizzolo
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
Gift this article