Russia: Chamber of Patent Disputes allows legal contraband

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Russia: Chamber of Patent Disputes allows legal contraband

Luis Caballero, a famous Spanish liquor company filed a trademark application No 2016718658 for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages except beer).

contra-bando-150.jpg

As expected, the patent office rejected the application because, as is easily understood in any language, it means illegal traffic of goods through the border. The examiner referred specifically to this fact. He reminded the applicant that unlawful transit of goods through the border violates customs regulations which is in contradiction of public interest and Russian law in general.

The applicant appealed the decision to the Chamber of Patent Disputes. He pointed out that the designation rejected by the patent office had been in wide use for quite a while in Russia. The goods are being sold in many big shops, chain stores and on the Internet. The goods are popular with buyers. Controlling bodies (customs etc.) do not have any objections to such sales, nor are there objections to the labelling of the goods.

The Chamber of Patent Disputes agreed with the arguments raised by the applicant and explained its position as follows.

It is true that the claimed designation includes word elements meaning "contraband". The designation elicits associations in the minds of consumers which are directly connected to the meaning of the word.

On the other hand, consumers understand that the claimed goods in Class 33 are necessarily subject to customs clearance when they cross the Russian border. They are subject to excise duty, and in such circumstances the designation is perceived by the consumer as something jocular and original in character. Besides, the applicant submitted documents showing that rum labelled with the claimed designation has already been on sale in the Russian Federation and has become famous as a drink characterised by a balanced taste. It has a bright, vibrant colour and bright golden tinge. As for the name used on the label of the alcoholic drink, it has interesting historical roots. The applicant produced documents supporting the choice of the name.

The name came about as a result of a notary public, Fernando Mora, who spent a holiday in the Dominican Republic. There he tasted a variety of rum and was enchanted by it. He packed several bottles of the drink in his trunk and smuggled it home to Spain. His friends also liked it. By chance, Mr Luiz Enrique Caballero Domingues, president of the old vinery, Luis Caballero, tasted it too and liked it.

He decided to buy the rum in 2012 and called it "Contrabando". The choice was clearly good because in 2013 the rum won a gold medal at Congreso Internacional del Ron.

The Chamber of Patent Disputes considered this and also took into account the fact that the claimed designation had obtained registration in the European Union (Reg. No 10606101).

Thus the Chamber of Patent Disputes concluded that registration of the claimed designation would not contradict public interest.

biriulin-vladimir.jpg

Vladimir Biriulin


Gorodissky & PartnersRussia 129010, MoscowB. Spasskaya Str25, stroenie 3Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123pat@gorodissky.ru www.gorodissky.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, ELTEMATE
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
Gift this article