Myanmar: Myanmar introduces new patent law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Myanmar: Myanmar introduces new patent law

new-law-myanmar-min-final.jpg

On March 11 2019, the Myanmar parliament enacted the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law No. 7/2019 (Patent Law) heralding the dawn of a new era in patent registration in Myanmar. While the new Trade Mark Law passed on January 30 2019 is expected to come into force this year, the new Patent Law is pending and will come into operation only upon notification from the president of Myanmar.

The new patent regime is welcome news for both corporations and aspiring inventors. Traditionally, businesses in Myanmar have relied on colonial-era laws to protect their intellectual property. Patent rights were recognised by the Myanmar Registration Office upon receipt of a Declaration of Ownership of Patent based on a granted corresponding patent. It is also incumbent on the patent proprietor to publish a notice in a local newspaper every three years to assert ownership of their patent. The absence of an official framework for patent registration has imposed difficulties for patent owners when it comes to protecting their inventions and enforcing their rights against infringers in Myanmar.

Under the new Patent Law, a Myanmar Intellectual Property Office comprising a registrar, a department and examiners will be established under the Ministry of Commerce to administer patent registrations under a first-to-file system. The Patent Law provides protection for both patents with a protection term of 20 years and utility models (petty patents) with a term of 10 years. The recognised requirements for patentability of an invention apply – novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability, although petty patents do not have to fulfil the requirements for inventive step. Like other jurisdictions, discoveries, scientific theories, mathematical methods, systems and rules of doing business, performance of mental acts and playing games, and computer programs will not be patentable in Myanmar. Also excluded from patentability are methods for treatment of the human and animal body and inventions related to naturally occurring substances and their new uses.

Importantly, pharmaceutical products are exempt from protection until January 1 2033 whereas chemical products for agricultural uses, food products and microbiological products are exempt from protection until July 1 2021. These exceptions are made in accordance with the transitional extended period to exempt certain inventions under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs Agreement) for least-developed country members.

Patent applications can be filed in English or Burmese, with submission of a certified translation as directed by the registrar. Priority may be claimed under the Paris Convention, and applicants have up to 36 months from filing to request substantive examination. A compulsory licence can also be requested for a Myanmar patent.

Once implemented, the suite of patent laws will pave the way for the creation of a structured and comprehensive patent regime, bringing Myanmar into greater alignment with international standards and legal frameworks.

collopy-dan.jpg
teng-yeo-moon.jpg

Daniel Collopy

Yeo Moon Teng


Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd

152 Beach Road

#37-05/06 Gateway East

Singapore 189721

Tel: +65 6333 7200

Fax: +65 6333 7222

mail.asia@spruson.com

www.spruson.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Getty Images v Stability AI case, which will hear untested points of law, is a reminder of the importance of the legal system and the excitement it can generate
Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Partners at the firm explain why they’ve seen more SEP cases at the ITC, and why they are comfortable recommending the forum to clients
Gift this article