The IP pitfalls and opportunities of bankruptcy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The IP pitfalls and opportunities of bankruptcy

In a session on bankruptcy, due diligence, and dual filings and assignments at the AIPLA Annual Meeting, panelists spoke of the challenges that IP lawyers face when dealing in bankruptcy and transactional matters.

Though IP lawyers often don’t see bankruptcy as a big part of their practice, Jennifer McCallum of the McCallum Law Firm points out that it is a lucrative and increasingly important field. One reason is that Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sometimes referred to as a reorganization bankruptcy, automatically stays all litigation against the filer. This, McCallum noted, can yield significant tactical advantages in IP cases.

“In Chapter 11, what we’re seeing is that a tech company gets sued for infringement, and it’s a way to stop the case, because it absolutely stops litigation the minute the tech company files,” she said. “They can then put in a claim for liquidating all their intellectual property, or just become a licensing house.” McCallum said: “It’s basically a litigation play.”

The Chapter 11 stay on litigation can pose other challenges for lawyers. For example, because companies have largely run out of money and can’t be sued, there’s a real possibility that their own prosecution counsel will not be paid.

“So if you’re prosecution counsel, stop work,” McCallum warned. “But don’t pay for things because you may not get paid back.”

Companies dealing with business partners undergoing bankruptcy also need to be aware of some of the legal pitfalls. For example, if your company is a creditor to another that is going through bankruptcy, your company may be able to file liens on the debtor’s assets, including its patents and trademarks. However, McCallum notes that lawyers often make mistakes when filing the lien. Most state courts have held that a security interest may be perfected when a lien is filed with the Secretary of State where the debtor is organized. However, because the law is not completely settled, there have been some other decisions which took the position that the lien must be filed with the USPTO to perfect the security interest.

Thus, McCallum says, to be on the safe side, creditors looking to perfect a security interest in a trademark or a patent should file its lien with both the state office and the USPTO.

Bankruptcy can also pose opportunities for rights holders. Companies going through a bankruptcy must file a Schedule B form, which lists all of the company’s assets. Thus, as McCallum explains, if your company wishes to buy the assets, including the IP assets, of a bankrupt competitor, pulling their Schedule B form will list all the assets that you can bid for.

However, buying IP from a bankrupt seller also poses its own challenges. Because the bankrupt company was likely having trouble paying its patent and trademark attorneys, buyers need to be especially careful in their due diligence to make sure that things like maintenance fees or deadlines for applications are all up to date. Failure to identify these issues can cause problems down the road, and courts or the USPTO aren’t likely to excuse these issues on the grounds that it was the previous owner that committed these mistakes.

Despite the challenges that bankruptcy poses, McCallum says that they can be great opportunities for lawyers. This is true even if it’s a client who is going bankrupt – in which case, she advises, the lawyer should contact the bankruptcy trustee and ask to become employed by the bankruptcy trustee. The lawyer has to make a case to be hired (for example, there are a lot of pending applications that cannot be allowed to lapse) and also make an estimate of the costs.

“When there’s no litigation and the economy is kind of down, bankruptcy is up,” she notes. “It’s great to have a practice that’s always busy.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Richard de Bodo, who had a lengthy career at international firms, shares how he will address client needs and praises the unique offerings of smaller firms
An Australian top court decision clarifying honest concurrent use and wins by publishers against AI platforms were also among the top talking points
AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Azhar Sadique and Kane Ridley, who founded the London office in 2023, are now both working in legal tech and AI-related roles, while another UK-based lawyer has also left
Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Gift this article