Looking for the wow factor in designs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Looking for the wow factor in designs

“Good morning trademark people,” began Grégoire Bisson, Director of The Hague Registry, at the Madrid System Users’ Meeting yesterday. “There’s nothing wrong with trademarks, but once you’ve worked in designs there is no going back.”

The WIPO official explained his enthusiasm for the world of design law by outlining how important design has become to IP over the past 50 years. “We used to buy watches by looking for the most reliable watch for our budget,” he said. “Trademarks offered some promise of that reliability. Now though, reliability is assumed and what people look for is design. People want products that have the ‘wow’ factor.”

Design registrations have grown at twice the speed of trademark registrations over the past nine years, Bisson said. Most design owners, however, seek protection in their home country. That’s because there is territoriality of rights, making the application process cumbersome and expensive. The good news for design owners is that the Hague System, administered by WIPO, can make the application process more efficient. The bad news is that it has limited geographical scope, compared with the scope of protection offered to trademarks through the Madrid System.

“But stay tuned,” said Bisson. “The Hague System will grow massively.” South Korea is due to join in July, the United States in October, and Japan, China, the 10 Asean countries and Russia could join in 2015. Canada, Mexico and ARIPO are also considering whether to accede to the Hague Agreement.

Expansion of the System, however, could lead to what Bisson described as “complexification.” One solution is for WIPO member states to agree on a draft Design Law Treaty, designed to simplify registration formalities for industrial designs. At WIPO’s Extraordinary General Assembly last week, member states discussed convening a diplomatic conference on the Treaty. Even if that does not mature into domestic legislation for many years, said Bisson, it will act as a best practice model for IP offices around the world.

Yesterday’s Madrid System Users Meeting also featured presentations from representatives of trademark offices in Tunisia, Mexico, India, OAPI and Hong Kong, while WIPO officials provided an update on changes to the system, and how trademark owners can make better use of it. For more details, see page 5.

To find out more about designs, attend today's session IM20 The Shape of Things to Come: Clearing and Protecting High-Tech Product Configurations​ from 11:45 am to 1:00 pm in Convention Hall A.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article