EU set for harmonised rules on trade secrets

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

EU set for harmonised rules on trade secrets

The European Commission has today proposed a directive on trade secrets to replace the patchwork of rules across the EU

The draft directive introduces a common definition of trade secrets, sets out procedures for victims of trade secret misappropriation to seek redress and introduces measures that courts may use to avoid leakage of trade secrets submitted to it in the course of civil litigation on trade secrets theft.

The proposed rules come after officials in Brussels commissioned a study and held a public consultation on the issue. It concluded that businesses find it hard to understand the rules on trade secrets across the EU and are reluctant to sue alleged infringers for fear that the courts will not keep their trade secrets confidential.

The Commission says that one in five European companies has been the victim of trade secret misappropriation, or attempts at misappropriation, at least once in the past 10 years.

Vice-President Antonio Tajani said that protecting trade secrets is particularly important for smaller businesses, which rely more heavily on trade secret protection than larger companies – in part because of the cost of patenting and protection against infringement.

At the moment, 18 EU member states have laws on misappropriation of trade secrets, although some, including Germany and Spain, do not define what trade secrets are. In Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands and the UK there are no specific provisions on trade secrets in civil law. Trade secrets are only protected by contract in Cyprus, while in France misappropriation of manufacturing secrets is a criminal offence if committed by employees.

The Commission says that the new proposal will align the rules in the EU with civil law rules in Japan and the US.

The draft directive will now go before the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament for adoption.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article