Pagenberg attacks unitary patent package as an “unworkable solution”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pagenberg attacks unitary patent package as an “unworkable solution”

Jochen Pagenberg, a former member of an EU Commission-appointed Expert Committee on the future patent court, has told the EU president that the unitary patent package due to be discussed by member states today is an “unworkable solution”

In an open letter to Herman van Rumpuy, he accuses EU officials of negotiating the deal without proper transparency.

“[T]he details of how this dossier has been handled by the instances in Brussels over the last six months show such an amount of undemocratic behavior that few people in Europe would have imagined,” he writes.

“The multiplication of compromises has resulted in an unworkable solution which industry will no longer wish to use because of serious drafting errors of people who obviously have no practical experience in patent litigation and are not interested in any advice of those who have.”

Pagenberg, a partner in German IP firm Bardehle Pagenberg, goes on to say that there is not enough time before the end of the Danish presidency on June 30 to devote to remedying problems in the patent deal.

The letter was copied to officials from the Danish government and the European Commission, members of the European Parliament who have followed the patent package debates closely, and to journalists.

His last-ditch attempt to urge politicians to rethink the unitary patent package come on the day that ministers in charge of IP policy across the EU meet in Brussels to discuss the issue.

The Council’s deliberations are normally broadcast live. But Managing IP understands that the patent discussions will not be shown as they relate to an international agreement rather than EU legislation.

EU negotiators say that the location of the central division is the only issue to be resolved before the unitary patent and unified patent court can be agreed.

Meanwhile, a group of lawyers and judges submitted a final proposal this month on the rules of procedure for the court to the European Commission. The draft incorporates suggestions made in 31 responses received from industry and professional bodies across the EU and runs to some 162 pages including edits.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Magdalena Bonde discusses Abion’s AI experiments and reveals why an entrepreneurial mindset and a willingness to learn about a business are essential skills
Partner Ginevra Righini explains how she secured victory for the Comité Champagne in its fight against an EUTM application for ‘Nero Champagne’
Volkan Hamamcıoğlu joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss meditation, tackling deadlines, and taking inspiration from Hamlet
A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Gift this article