UK government wants your views on copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK government wants your views on copyright

The UK government has published detailed proposals to clarify and extend copyright exceptions, in response to this year’s Hargreaves Review on intellectual property

The government wants businesses to provide "thoughts and evidence" on the wide-ranging reforms during a consultation period that will last until March 21 next year.

Most of the proposals concern copyright exceptions.

The government proposes creating a private copying exception. This would make it legal to copy a CD on to an MP3 player, something that many users do already.

It also wants to introduce an exception for parody and pastiche, which it says will give greater creative freedom to comedians.

The exception for non-commercial research will be widened to allow data mining, and exceptions affecting education, quotation and people with disabilities will be updated.

In addition, the government wants to establish licensing and clearance procedures for orphan works, to open them up for consumers and researchers, and to provide for voluntary extended collective licensing schemes.

These schemes, similar to those that exist in Scandinavia, would allow collecting societies to license rights on behalf of all rights owners in a sector, apart from those who have opted out.

The proposals closely follow the recommendations made in the Hargreaves Review, published on May 19. They were endorsed by Vince Cable, the business minister, in August.

Baroness Wilcox, minister for IP, said in a statement today that "some freeing up of existing copyright legislation can deliver real value to the UK economy without risking our excellent creative industries".

The Hargreaves Review was commissioned following concerns, including those expressed by Prime Minister David Cameron, that the UK might not offer a conducive climate to new technology businesses such as Google.

It is likely to attract a lot of comments. Groups representing consumers will probably welcome the proposals to clarify exceptions, but some copyright owners might feel they go too far. For example, academic publishers are known to have reservations about the data mining proposals.

There may also be concerns about overlap between national and EU or international legislation. For example, the European Commission is also planning a directive dealing with orphan works.

Another Hargreaves recommendation was the creation of a digital copyright exchange. Last month the government appointed Richard Hooper to run a feasibility study on this issue.

More information on the consultation, including the response form, is available on the IPO website. Responses can be sent to David Burgess at the IPO by email.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article