The Philippines: Starwood proves use of trade mark through online transactions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Philippines: Starwood proves use of trade mark through online transactions

Does a trade mark owner have to be physically present in the Philippines to show genuine use of a mark? In the case of W Land Holdings Inc v Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Inc (G.R. No. 222366, December 4 2017), the Supreme Court (SC) ruled in favour of Starwood, asserting that it makes actual use of its W mark in the Philippines. This case arose from a cancellation action filed with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL).

On May 29 2009, W Land, a real estate company, filed an action to cancel Starwood's trade mark registration for its W mark on the ground that Starwood had failed to use its mark because it had no hotel or establishment in the Philippines offering the services covered by its registration. Starwood denied having abandoned its W mark, and alleged that it had already filed a Declaration of Actual Use in 2008 which was accepted by the IPOPHL. It argued that it operates an interactive website to accommodate its potential clients worldwide and allows Philippine residents to make reservations and bookings, clearly showing use of the W mark in the Philippines.

The SC, affirming the decisions of the Office of the Director General of the IPOPHL and the Court of Appeal, explained and held as follows:

i) There must be bona fide use of the mark, not token use. This may be characterised as use which results or tends to result, in one way or another, in a commercial interaction or transaction in the ordinary course of business. The mere exhibition of goods or services over the internet is not enough to constitute actual use. It must be shown that the trade mark owner has actually transacted or intentionally targeted customers of a particular jurisdiction. Showing an actual commercial link to the country is therefore imperative.

ii) Starwood proved that it owns Philippine registered domain names, for example, www.whotels.ph and www.wreservations.ph. These websites are readily accessible to Philippine citizens and residents and they can use them to instantaneously book and pay for their accommodation, with immediate confirmation, in any of its W hotels. It further presented data of the growing number of internet users in the Philippines visiting its website since 2003, and thus, taken together Starwood showed that use of the W mark through its interactive website was intended to produce and establish commercial interaction with Philippine consumers.

iii) Starwood submitted in 2008 its Declaration of Actual Use (DAU) which the IPOPHL accepted and recognised as valid. The SC found no reason to disturb this recognition.

Hechanova

Editha R Hechanova


Hechanova & Co., Inc.Salustiana D. Ty Tower104 Paseo de Roxas AvenueMakati City 1229, PhilippinesTel: (63) 2 812-6561Fax: (63) 2 888-4290editharh@hechanova.com.ph 

www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article