France: 2024 Olympic Games create trade mark challenges

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: 2024 Olympic Games create trade mark challenges

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

Paris will welcome the summer Olympic Games in 2024. This is a huge challenge for the Organising Committee.

The licensing policy of the Olympic Committee of the Olympic signs and symbols is an important aspect of the games and a bill is under discussion in the French Parliament to extend the rights of the National Olympic and Paralympic Committees to the logo, the slogan and the mascot that will be specifically created for the occasion.

These provisions will complete the Sports Code which provides, in Article L.141-5, for the protection of the Olympic signs. As a result, the filing as a trade mark or the reproduction, imitation, affixation, removal or modification of such signs constitutes counterfeiting and is punished as such.

The bill in discussion also provides that terms such as Olympique (Olympic), Olympisme (Olympism), Jeux Olympiques (Olympic Games) and Paris 2024 will be protected. However, this extension has led to criticism and an amendment was proposed to limit the protection to use made with reference to the Olympic Games of the modern age, or to sporting competitions or practice.

Up until now, French jurisdictions have differentiated between using such words in order to inform the public for instance, on a well-known result or to announce a future game, and their exploitation for commercial purposes. Reproduction of a sport result already public and reference to a future competition already announced do not constitute infringment. Trade mark infringement occurs when the use is made for commercial purposes and not for information purposes.

Even if fighting against counterfeits is more important than ever, one assumes that the balance between trade mark rights and freedom of expression and information will nevertheless continue to exist.

Aurélia Marie

Emmanuelle Machinet


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article