Guest post: Keeping the record straight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Guest post: Keeping the record straight

Popova-Pölzleitner-Anna-crop-168

Anna Popova, director of assignments at Brandstock, discusses the long and winding road of recordals

Popova-Pölzleitner-Anna
Anna Popova

Mention recordals to most in-house IP lawyers and the invariable response is, understandably perhaps, one of fear and loathing: fear of what can go wrong and loathing of the demands placed on time and resources. The sheer number and variety of documents required and the logistics involved in liaison with local agents can be daunting. Then there is the long tail of recordals (some can take as long as 14 years to complete) when inevitable staff changes can spell disaster. 

Recordals projects present some mighty challenges that even the most seasoned project manager would do well to approach with caution.

Recording changes in ownership, including name changes, matters for a number of obvious reasons including:

  • Pending applications and renewals may be adversely affected.

  • Civil and other enforcement actions (including Customs recordals) may be prejudiced.

  • Rights in trade marks may be compromised where there are licences in place.

Cost control

Cost is an ever-present concern and apparent savings from selective recordals can prove far costlier in the long run, even though financially or politically expedient in the short term.

From the start it is important to be able to predict and budget for expenditure accurately and transparently; this alone can be a huge task if handled in-house as enquiries have to be made with local agents just to get that information together - something that can take weeks, if not months.

Setting priorities

However efficient your process not everything can, or need be, done at once. It is advisable to set priorities and to formulate what we like to call priority buckets into which you place countries that should be addressed first, whether because they are more commercially important; because there are pending issues in those markets that require urgent attention; or because local procedural/regulatory rules make early commencement essential.

Managing priorities is a risk management call and so there are no hard and fast rules; experience and a close understanding of business needs is of paramount importance.

Docketing details

Maintaining an accurate and up-to-date record of what has been done in your IP management system is of course crucial.

The time-honoured principle of rubbish in, rubbish out is a persistent reality as is making sure that relevant documents (usually stored in PDF) are also available. It is not always possible for service providers to enter data direct into a management system (indeed some software providers prohibit it). However there are ways in which bulk transfer of data and/or documents can be achieved reliably.

Recordals is perhaps best thought of as a combination of science and art: it requires knowledge; experience and, at times, no small amount of creativity.

At Brandstock we have produced a series of short posts on this topic which we believe you will find informative and thought provoking: Recordals - the voice of experience; Top 10 priorities to consider when planning your next recordal project; and Seven arguments to file your recordals as a project.

(Managing IP is not responsible for the content in external links.)

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
The firm launched a San Diego office earlier this month, but California investment and expansion is far from complete
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
Gift this article