Guest post: The economic impact of the global trade in counterfeit goods

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guest post: The economic impact of the global trade in counterfeit goods

OECD logo 168

Juan José Caselles of Elzaburu in Madrid discusses the recently published OECD/EUIPO report on counterfeit goods

Caselles Juan Jose
Juan José Caselles

A report entitled Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact, by the OECD and the EUIPO, was presented on Monday at the OECD’s Paris headquarters.  The publication of this study comes on the eve of the 2016 OECD Integrity Forum, running from April 19 to 20 2016. The two institutions have analysed nearly 0.5 million Customs seizures around the world from 2010 to 2013, and have prepared the most rigorous estimate to date of the global trade in counterfeit goods.

Salient points

The results of the study refer to Customs seizures and do not include counterfeit and parallel goods produced and consumed within the country or products that have been pirated online. Some salient points of the study follow below:

- In 2013, the international trade in counterfeit or pirated goods constituted 2.5% of world trade at $461 billion.  That amount is equivalent to the GDP of Austria, or the combined GDP of Ireland and the Czech Republic, which gives a clearer idea of the potential economic revenue obtained by the criminal organisations involved in this trade.

- In 2013, the importation of goods of this kind into the EU reached 5% of total imports, valued at €85 billion ($116 billion), which suggests that counterfeits in the EU have double the impact that they do worldwide.

- Counterfeiting and piracy have a huge impact on a global economy that is propelled by innovation, and they are the main threat to a knowledge-based economy. IP protection and enforcement is one of the primary driving forces behind innovation, contributing towards long-term economic growth.

The countries whose companies have been hit hardest by the trade in counterfeit and pirated products are: the United States (20%); Italy (15%); France and Switzerland (12%); Japan and Germany (8%)

- Counterfeiters and pirates maximise profits by targeting all market segments: both consumers who believe that they are buying the genuine article (primary market) and those who directly seek to purchase counterfeit goods (secondary market). 

- Any product to which IP adds economic value and creates price differences becomes a target for counterfeiters. This affects all kinds of products and consumers of top-end products, B2B companies and ordinary consumers.

- Counterfeiting and piracy is a global and dynamic phenomenon that leans on trade recovery following the crisis, the opening up of markets in many regions, the emergence and globalisation of value chains and the boom in electronic commerce.

- Goods of this kind come from virtually all economies across all the continents, with China being the largest producer.

- The countries whose companies have been hit hardest by the trade in counterfeit and pirated products are: the United States (20%); Italy (15%); France and Switzerland (12%); Japan and Germany (8%); the United Kingdom (4%); Luxembourg (3%); Finland, Spain and Belgium (2%) and China (1%). Some emerging countries whose innovative companies rely on IP as the basis for their global development strategy are also affected by infringements of this kind.

- The trade routes for counterfeit and pirated products are complex and subject to dynamic change. Some of the transit points are countries with weak governance or a strong criminal organisation or terrorist network presence, such as Afghanistan and Syria. The trade routes change each year in order to exploit any weak spots or absence of supervisory mechanisms that present themselves at any given time.

- The continued increase in the percentage of small consignments, primarily through postal parcels or courier companies, due to the increasing importance of the internet and e-commerce in world trade. On the one hand, traffickers benefit from the reduced costs that such consignments entail, the fact that they can avoid detection and the minimisation of the risk of being penalised, while on the other hand, the operational costs involved in Customs supervision and detention of goods go up due to the huge volume of consignments.

Political solutions

OECD logo

The various countries can and must establish, either individually or together, political solutions that protect against this global phenomenon which not only affects IP rights holders but also the member state itself and society as a whole.

As stated in the background paper for the 2016 OECD Integrity Forum, the cost of failing to act is significant as it exposes society to global threats engendered by the dark side of globalisation, where the absence of effective integrity checks in Customs administrations may benefit organised crime and enable illicit trade and smuggling, of both strictly prohibited goods and counterfeits, to thrive.

The loss in Customs revenue as a result of corruption in this sector in the OECD member states is estimated to be at least $2 billion a year, to which a blind eye cannot be turned. 

Juan José Caselles, lawyer and associate partner, anti-counterfeiting department, Elzaburu



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Practitioners say increasing the pecuniary jurisdiction of India’s most popular litigation forum to around $2 million would spark unpredictability and make it difficult for SMEs to benefit
The Spain-based firm has appointed an industry veteran to lead the group, which it hopes will strengthen its ability to support clients in ‘disruptive technologies’
Shaina Haria, a final-seat trainee at an international law firm’s UK office, shares how she fell in love with IP and why the area of law has changed the way she views the world
Now in its sixth edition, the IP Case Law Conference was focussed on the notion of ‘growing through change’
Nick Redfearn and Khanh Nguyen of Rouse discuss Vietnam’s latest identification in the 2026 Special 301 Report and how the country is taking genuine steps to meet US expectations
Tatiana Campello reflects on 30 years of practising at the firm, and urges women IP attorneys to think beyond the day-to-day
A David v Goliath battle involving TikTok, and Via Licensing Alliance adding new members to its Voice Codec patent pool, were also among the top talking points
Latham & Watkins bolstered its IP litigation bench in California with the addition of Kieran Kieckhefer, as partner demand for trial-ready expertise shows no sign of slowing
With the launch of a new patent eligibility AI tool, Sterne Kessler is leading a growing movement of law firms taking AI development into their own hands
UPC cases are (very) gradually becoming more distributed across other local divisions outside Germany, which can only be good news for the pan-European forum
Gift this article