Your IP Stars research questions answered

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Your IP Stars research questions answered

If you are responsible for submitting questionnaires and information for legal directories, make sure you spend an hour catching up with yesterday’s webinar on the 2016 IP Stars research

ip20stars20stacked20400.jpg

The webinar marked the beginning of this year’s research process. Questionnaires will be available to fill in from October 1, and the rankings will be published from February next year.

Our senior researchers Jakob Schnaidt and Kingsley Egbuonu took part in yesterday’s webinar, along with Phil Cox, president of Global Law Marketing, who provided an independent perspective on completing questionnaires and handling interviews.

As well as setting out how the research works and showing examples of our questionnaires, the researchers did their best to answer a wide variety of questions that listeners sent in. These included: How do we decide who to interview? Is it better to suggest small or large clients? Is there a limit on how many attorneys can be submitted? Can quantitative information be provided? And can we do interviews in languages other than English?

If you have any questions about the 2016 IP Stars research, listening to the webinar is a good place to start. We will also be posting a FAQ based on the questions received on the IP Stars website soon.

What you think of directories

However, the webinar was not only about answering questions; we also asked some of the audience.

  • The first was “How important are legal directory rankings to your firm from a marketing perspective?” 34% said “Very important”, 35% said “Important” and just 4% said “Not important” while 28% said “Depends on the directory”.

  • Second, we asked “Where do you mention your legal directory rankings?” 24% said “Business pitch documents”, 32% said “Website”, 1% said “Email signature” and 3% “Other” while 40% said “All of the above”.

  • Finally, in answer to the question “Would you be interested in joining a webinar dedicated to how firms can use directory rankings in marketing?” 51% said “Yes, definitely”, 39% said “Possibly” and 10% said “No”.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
As Marshall Gerstein celebrates its 70-year anniversary, Jeffrey Sharp, managing partner, reflects on lessons that shaped both his career and the firm’s success
News of two pharma deals involving Novo Nordisk and GSK and a loss for Open AI were also among the top talking points
Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Gift this article