US patent litigation up 12.4%, with trolls the top 10 plaintiffs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US patent litigation up 12.4%, with trolls the top 10 plaintiffs

A new report from Lex Machina underlines how quickly patent litigation is increasing, and reveals the districts with the biggest caseloads, the top plaintiffs and the most popular targets for litigation (no prizes for guessing which firm is sued the most)

The number of new patent litigation cases filed in US district courts last year was up 12.4% on 2012, according to the new Patent Litigation Year in Review report from Lex Machina. Some 6,092 new cases were filed last year, compared with 5,418 the year before.

The Eastern District of Texas and District of Delaware had the biggest increases in cases. The Eastern District of Texas had 1,495 new cases filed, up 20% over 2012. Delaware had 1,336 cases, up 33% over 2012. In contrast, the Central District of California had the greatest decrease, with its 399 cases down 20% on 2012.

Trials were held in 128 patent cases last year, including 52 bench trials and 63 jury trials, while 13 cases involved both bench and jury trials. More than half of all trials were held in the District of Delaware (with 25), the Eastern District of Texas (25) or the Southern District of New York (17). Cases went to trial the fastest in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, with its 255 day median time to trial roughly 12 times faster than the 2,423 days in the slowest district, the Western District of New York.

Judge Rodney Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas was assigned the most new cases, with 941. No other judge in any district was assigned more than 400. Judge Leonard Stark’s 399 cases ranked him second.

Fish & Richardson, with 308 cases, led all national law firms ranked by open cases filed between 2009-2013. Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell led all Delaware firms, with 604 open cases. Ward & Smith led Texas firms with 245 open cases.

All of the top 10 plaintiffs that filed the most new patent cases are defined by LexMachina as patent monetization entities. Melvino/ArrivalStar, Wyncomm and Thermolife each filed more than 100 cases. In contrast, seven of the 10 top plaintiffs with most patents asserted in open cases are operating companies, including Ericsson, Finisar, Motorola Mobility, Apple, Philips and Pfizer.

Apple was named the defendant in 59 new cases, followed by Amazon with 50 cases, AT&T with 45 cases, Google with 39 cases, Dell, HTC and Samsung all with 38 cases, Microsoft with 35 cases, and LG and HP both with 34.

Some 4,917 patents were asserted in all the cases filed in 2013. Of these, 3,032 – or 61% – had not been litigated in the past 10 years. ArrivalStar and Melvio jointly asserted six of the 10 most frequently asserted patents, all involving systems for monitoring or tracking vehicle status, travel or proximity.

The size of damage awards continues to go up, with the average increasing 28% last year and the median increasing 22%. The biggest damage award last year was the $1 billion awarded to Monsanto from DuPont for infringement of a patent for genetically modifies seeds.

New ITC investigations stabilized at 41, compared with 2012's 42, after spiking to 70 in 2011. Of the six ITC Administrative Law Judges currently serving, Charles Bullock has disposed of the most investigations – 125 in total. Theodore Essex resolved 86 investigations, Edwards Gildea resolved 57, David Shaw resolved 29, Thomas Pender resolved 23 and Sandra Lord resolved just three.

The 2013 Patent Litigation Year in Review can be downloaded here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article