Free content in our latest issue

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Free content in our latest issue

The combined December/January issue of Managing IP is now live on the website, and it’s a good opportunity to highlight some items that are freely available to all readers

mip-dec-jan-2014.jpg

Notably, this month, we re-publish our latest sponsored roundtable on litigation in Latin America, featuring contributions from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico as well as from the UK and US IP attachés.

The discussion covered a range of issues, but speed and predictability in the courts topped people’s concerns.

UK IP attaché Sheila Alves said: “The most complaints I have heard is that it is too slow to litigate in Brazil, and there is a lack of specialised judges,” while Albert Keyack, her US counterpart, added: “Part of the slowness complaint is that the Brazilian PTO has a backlog. However the government has recently given them more resources to hire more examiners, which is welcome. I think you will see those complaints become less prominent as the speed of examination improves.”

Areas where improvements are needed include damages claims, preliminary injunctions and judicial training, said the participants. “We require certain guidelines to decide the proof of experts for infringement and cancellation cases. We need more guidelines to evaluate and apply the decisions on technical evidence,” said Alejandro Luna of Olivares & Cia.

Alberto Guerra of Guerra Law added: “The other thing is to improve the quality of judges and in particular experts, who have a very important role in patent litigation because the judges do not understand the technology.”

Gabriela Duran

In-house counsel Gabriela Duran of One-Red Argentina (left) sounded an optimistic note: “Overall, I am optimistic that things have improved since IP rights started to be more relevant in Latin America. And yes! We still have a long road ahead of us, but we have improved in the past, and we still do it.”

The December/January issue also includes many contributions from our international briefings correspondents in various countries.

These cover issues such as the moves towards a single patent system in Australia and New Zealand; the examination of foreign trade mark applications in China; the amended Rule 164 at the EPO; why the patent invalidation rate at the JPO is falling; and lessons on intent-to-use applications from a US trade mark case involving Polo.

Here are all this month’s briefings:

Argentina: Trade secrets and the employer-employee relationship

Australia: Australia and New Zealand move closer to a single patent

Austria: Who owns a design right?

Belgium: The strict Belgian patent law

Canada: A lesson in drafting settlement agreements

China trade marks: Examination of foreign trade mark applications

Croatia: Changes to IP crime law

European Patent Office: New rule makes applicants more equal

France: Changes coming on patent limitation

Germany: Federal Supreme Court endorses functional claim language

Greece: New procedural rules on trade mark prosecution

India: No compulsory licence without reasonable efforts

Indonesia: Get ready for anything.id

Japan: Hindsight excluded in inventive step

Malaysia: Changes to industrial design protection

Mexico: Evidence in non-use actions

Middle East: All you need to know about IP in the GCC

New Zealand: An integrated approach to patent protection

The Philippines: Non-payment of filing fees is fatal

Romania: Debatable new approach to trade mark examination

Russia: Court sides with Gagarin’s daughter

Singapore: Post-published data in Singapore

South Korea: Supreme Court rules on English/Korean marks

Switzerland: Equivalence doctrine comes into line

Taiwan: Pharmaceutical patent term extension

US Trade marks: PRL challenges intent-to-use application

The roundtable and the international briefings are sponsored by the participating firms.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Patrick Ogola joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss helping African entrepreneurs on the global stage, and explains why young lawyers should speak up
Heli Pihlajamaa, the EPO’s principal director for patent law and procedures, joins us to take stock of the unitary patent following its second anniversary
Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Gift this article