As I have mentioned in prior postings, one of my tasks this year as AIPLA President is to represent U.S. intellectual property interests around the world. (By the way, I learned that people in some South American countries pronounce our country’s U.S.A. initials as a word, such as asking “Are you from Ooh-SAh?”) There are a number of issues that keep coming up in discussion, but the one I’d like to focus on today is “patent attorneys” and privilege.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
Publication of the UPC’s annual report and adoption of the procedural rules of the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre were also among major developments
Senior UK judges discussing the impact of AI on the judiciary, and the role of in-house IP lawyers during corporate transactions and carve-outs were among the top talking points
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Annual Meeting hears that IP firms are targeting hires with technical literacy in a fragmented landscape, and that those that build an online presence will distinguish themselves from the digital chaos
How law firms can secure themselves in a technology-driven IP landscape and how IP teams can develop future leadership were among the top talking points