Confirmed: UK to shun unitary patent and UPC

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Confirmed: UK to shun unitary patent and UPC

Europe viewed from space at night with city lights in European Union member states, global EU business and finance, satellite communication technology, 3D render of planet Earth, world map from NASA

The government says that UPC membership and CJEU oversight would be inconsistent with its objective of being a self-governing nation



The UK will not participate in the proposed Unified Patent Court and unitary patent system, a spokesperson for the prime minister has confirmed.

In a statement last night, February 27, a spokesperson for 10 Downing Street said: “The UK will not be seeking involvement in the UP/UPC system. Participating in a court that applies EU law and is bound by the CJEU is clearly inconsistent with our objective of becoming an independent self-governing nation.”

The government’s confirmation ends speculation over whether the UK could have participated in the system post-Brexit.

The government’s line was previously that the UPC was “not an EU institution” and that the UK would play a part in the system.

In fact, just five months ago, Tim Moss, chief executive of the UKIPO, told Managing IP: “We believe the UK can continue to play a full role after Brexit and intend to explore continued participation in the unitary patent system and the UPC with our European partners.”  

However, the government’s stance has toughened since the general election on December 12 last year in which the Conservative Party won an 80-seat majority. 

Uncertainty about the UK’s involvement was not the only stumbling block holding the project back.

A constitutional challenge at the German Federal Constitutional Court is set to be decided in the first quarter of 2020, according to the judge in charge of the matter in an exclusive interview with Managing IP. If that ruling goes against the UPC then the entire project will be in serious doubt, if it isn’t already.

Should the UPC come into being, a key question will be whether it is still an attractive proposition without the UK. A survey of in-house counsel conducted by Managing IP last year suggested it would be.

To view our recent coverage on the UPC, click on the links below:

UPC case to be decided in early 2020

UPC report creates ‘point of legal difficulty’ for UK membership

UPC: businesses still on hold despite judge Huber announcement  

Avoiding the cliff edge: UKIPO’s Brexit preparations

UKIPO: UPC before Brexit ‘no longer possible’

Survey: UPC still attractive without UK  

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article