Preview: Judge Brückner-Hofmann interview

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Preview: Judge Brückner-Hofmann interview

Johanna Brückner-Hofmann

The Düsseldorf District Court judge admits being upset when an appeal judgment is badly argued and discusses the 1,900% increase in design cases at her court

“There are a few cases in which the appeal judgment, in my view, is clearly wrong or badly argued,” says Johanna Brückner-Hofmann in reference to her decisions being overruled but there being no convincing reason in the findings.

Brückner-Hofmann, who chairs a three-member panel specialising in design and unfair competition law at the Düsseldorf District Court (Landgericht) in Germany, admits, however, that this is a rare occurrence. 

She and her co-panellists hear around 100 design cases and between 120 and 150 unfair competition disputes every year. In her early days as a judge, however, Brückner-Hofmann would hear no more than five design cases per year – 1,900% less than today’s 100. 

In this exclusive interview with the judge, who has worked at the court since 1995, you can discover:

Why her workload has increased and what her most significant cases have been;

How she views the appeal process, especially when her cases are overturned;

What she thinks about diversity and recruitment in the German judiciary;

How she handles working part-time in an increasingly demanding role;

What annoys her in court; and

How the German system differs to that of other countries.

The full interview will be published tomorrow, August 28. It will be the fourth in our series of judge interviews following our discussions with Mr Justice Arnold and the late Mr Justice Carr of the England and Wales High Court, and Lord Kitchin of the UK Supreme Court. 







more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article