Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

On March 26 2019, the European Parliament voted in favour of the new EU Copyright Directive for the digital single market. As 73% of young European internet users listen to music, watch TV series and films or play games online, one of the Copyright Directive's changes concerns how online content sharing services should deal with copyrighted content.

Now, platforms that rely on user-uploaded content are required to obtain an authorisation from rights holders to make copyrighted content available to the public.

In the absence of a deal, online content-sharing service providers may be held liable for unauthorised acts of communication to the public of copyright-protected works, unless they are able to demonstrate that they have made a real effort to obtain a licence and acted expeditiously to stop users from accessing unauthorised content. Online platforms of more than three years and with an annual turnover over EUR 10 million must also make best efforts to prevent future uploads of the notified works.

In Brazil, Law 12,965/14 stipulates that internet providers can only be held liable for damages resulting from content generated by third parties if, after a specific court order, they do not take any steps to make the infringing content unavailable in a timely manner.

However, this liability exemption depends on a specific legal provision, which so far has not been enacted. Accordingly, Brazilian courts have steadily been applying Brazilian Copyright Law and dismissing copyright infringement claims if, after communication, the internet provider has removed the infringing content from its platform or blocked access to it.

As seen with the EU's GDPR and a similar Brazilian law approved in August 2018, European laws can influence Brazilian policy. As a result, considering the fast-growing consumption of online content by Brazilians, it is very important to follow closely any discussions generated by Article 17 of the new EU Copyright Directive in Brazil and to consider how it may impact Brazilian lawmakers.

Daniel Law

Antonio Curvello

Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article