Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: How does the EU’s new Copyright Directive compare with Brazilian law?

On March 26 2019, the European Parliament voted in favour of the new EU Copyright Directive for the digital single market. As 73% of young European internet users listen to music, watch TV series and films or play games online, one of the Copyright Directive's changes concerns how online content sharing services should deal with copyrighted content.

Now, platforms that rely on user-uploaded content are required to obtain an authorisation from rights holders to make copyrighted content available to the public.

In the absence of a deal, online content-sharing service providers may be held liable for unauthorised acts of communication to the public of copyright-protected works, unless they are able to demonstrate that they have made a real effort to obtain a licence and acted expeditiously to stop users from accessing unauthorised content. Online platforms of more than three years and with an annual turnover over EUR 10 million must also make best efforts to prevent future uploads of the notified works.

In Brazil, Law 12,965/14 stipulates that internet providers can only be held liable for damages resulting from content generated by third parties if, after a specific court order, they do not take any steps to make the infringing content unavailable in a timely manner.

However, this liability exemption depends on a specific legal provision, which so far has not been enacted. Accordingly, Brazilian courts have steadily been applying Brazilian Copyright Law and dismissing copyright infringement claims if, after communication, the internet provider has removed the infringing content from its platform or blocked access to it.

As seen with the EU's GDPR and a similar Brazilian law approved in August 2018, European laws can influence Brazilian policy. As a result, considering the fast-growing consumption of online content by Brazilians, it is very important to follow closely any discussions generated by Article 17 of the new EU Copyright Directive in Brazil and to consider how it may impact Brazilian lawmakers.

Daniel Law

Antonio Curvello

Daniel Legal & IP Strategy

Av. República do Chile, 230, 3rd Floor

Centro, Rio de Janeiro

20031-170, Brazil

Tel: +55 21 2102 4212

www.daniel-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With the US privacy landscape more fragmented and active than ever and federal legislation stalled, lawyers at Sheppard Mullin explain how states are taking bold steps to define their own regimes
Viji Krishnan of Corsearch unpicks the results of a survey that reveals almost 80% of trademark practitioners believe in a hybrid AI model for trademark clearance and searches
News of Via Licensing Alliance selling its HEVC/VCC pools and a $1.5 million win for Davis Polk were also among the top talking points
The winner of a high-profile bidding war for Warner Bros Discovery may gain a strategic advantage far greater than mere subscriber growth - IP licensing leverage
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Varuni Paranavitane of Finnegan and IP counsel Lisa Ribes compare and contrast two recent AI copyright decisions from Germany and the UK
Exclusive in-house data uncovered by Managing IP reveals French firms underperform on providing value equivalent to billing costs and technology use
The new court has drastically changed the German legal market, and the Munich-based firm, with two recent partner hires, is among those responding
Consultation feedback on mediation and arbitration rules and hires for Marks & Clerk and Heuking were also among the major talking points
Nick Groombridge shares how an accidental turn into patent law informed his approach to building a practice based on flexibility and balancing client and practitioner needs
Gift this article