The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil

Cialis® is a pharmaceutical product for the treatment of erectile dysfunction developed by Lilly ICOS, a joint venture of ICOS Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Cialis®, tadalafil, inhibits the PDE5 enzyme, just like sildenafil in the better-known Viagra®.

Recently, the District Court of The Hague had to decide whether a pharmaceutical unit dosage composition for a maximum daily dosage of 5mg of tadalafil for the treatment of a sexual dysfunction, as claimed in ICOS's patent EP1173181, involves an inventive step. Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe, claiming invalidity of the patent before the court, argued that this dosage composition is obvious in view of an earlier patent publication by ICOS (WO 97/03675).

Contrary to ICOS's submissions, by disclosing the use of tadalafil for sexual dysfunction, this earlier document incentivises the skilled person to develop a second in class drug for this indication and the skilled person would accordingly start clinical trials. As such, the court reasoned that the case comes down to the question of which dosages would be tested in a phase IIb clinical trial and whether 5mg would be part of this trial.

Following this reasoning, the court judged that the skilled person could then walk down two one-way streets, which would both inevitably lead to the dosage unit composition of 5 mg. Going down a first street, the skilled person would find pharmaceutical data in phase I clinical trial studies which would, together with known efficacy data for sildenafil in Viagra®, enable him to make the calculated estimation that a 5mg daily dosage should be included in phase IIb clinical trial tests. The court then further argued that, even if the skilled person would not take this street, but instead would turn into phase IIb clinical trial studies with daily dosages of 25, 50 and 100 mg, the skilled person would have found a constant efficacy of tadalafil at these dosages and would accordingly have lowered the dosage to reduce side effects. As such, either street would lead the skilled person to an effective daily dosage of 5mg with minimal side effects.

Therefore, in the court's decision, all roads obviously lead to Cialis®.

Henri van Kalkeren


V.O.Carnegieplein 5, 2517 KJThe HagueThe NetherlandsTel: +31 70 416 67 11Fax: +31 70 416 67 99info@vo.euwww.vo.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Gift this article