France: 2024 Olympic Games create trade mark challenges

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: 2024 Olympic Games create trade mark challenges

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

Paris will welcome the summer Olympic Games in 2024. This is a huge challenge for the Organising Committee.

The licensing policy of the Olympic Committee of the Olympic signs and symbols is an important aspect of the games and a bill is under discussion in the French Parliament to extend the rights of the National Olympic and Paralympic Committees to the logo, the slogan and the mascot that will be specifically created for the occasion.

These provisions will complete the Sports Code which provides, in Article L.141-5, for the protection of the Olympic signs. As a result, the filing as a trade mark or the reproduction, imitation, affixation, removal or modification of such signs constitutes counterfeiting and is punished as such.

The bill in discussion also provides that terms such as Olympique (Olympic), Olympisme (Olympism), Jeux Olympiques (Olympic Games) and Paris 2024 will be protected. However, this extension has led to criticism and an amendment was proposed to limit the protection to use made with reference to the Olympic Games of the modern age, or to sporting competitions or practice.

Up until now, French jurisdictions have differentiated between using such words in order to inform the public for instance, on a well-known result or to announce a future game, and their exploitation for commercial purposes. Reproduction of a sport result already public and reference to a future competition already announced do not constitute infringment. Trade mark infringement occurs when the use is made for commercial purposes and not for information purposes.

Even if fighting against counterfeits is more important than ever, one assumes that the balance between trade mark rights and freedom of expression and information will nevertheless continue to exist.

Aurélia Marie

Emmanuelle Machinet


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article