Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

The global patent battle between Apple and Samsung has elicited tens of thousands of news stories around the world. Their decision to end the litigation everywhere outside the US was revealed in a two-line statement today

apple20samsung20phones20200.jpg

“Samsung and Apple have agreed to drop all litigation between the two companies outside the United States,” said Samsung. “This agreement does not involve any licensing arrangements, and the companies are continuing to pursue the existing cases in US courts.”

The move marks the end of pending litigation in South Korea, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, and Japan.

The litigation between the two smartphone makers has proved lucrative for firms of lawyers and patent attorneys around the world. You can read about the firms acting for Apple and Samsung, as well as other players in the smartphone patent battles, in Managing IP.

In May this year a California jury chose to leave the total damages awarded to Apple against Samsung at $119.5 million in a case related to the related to the Korean company’s Galaxy S2 smartphone. The amount was far below the $2 billion Apple was seeking.

The jury also awarded Samsung damages of $158,400 for Apple infringing its '449 patent for recoding and reproducing image and speech. The jury found, however, that Samsung's '239 patent for a remote video transmission system had not been infringed. Samsung had been seeking $6 million in damages.

Florian_Mueller_Foss_Patents

Analyst Florian Müller (pictured left) wrote on his FOSS Patents blog that Apple may file a third US Apple v Samsung lawsuit. But he added: “that appears less likely to me than another possibility. It may very well be that at this point Apple just hopes for a somewhat face-saving exit by collecting a significant damages award (or, more likely, obtaining a settlement before it gets there) based on, for the most part, design patents.”

While the patent battles between Apple and Samsung have been raging, the South Korean company has been notching up sales of its smartphone products, particularly outside the United States. In the first quarter of this year Samsung shipped twice as many smartphones as its US rival, according to Strategy Analytics.

The same analysts reported last month that the Android operating system used by Samsung now has an 85% share of the global smartphone market.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article