EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Makers of Parma ham and Champagne already enjoy EU-wide geographical indication protection. Now the European Commission is considering whether to expand that protection to products such as Scottish tartans and Italian marble

Officials this week launched a green paper setting out why the Commission wants more products to fall within the EU’s GI scheme.

Michel Barnier, Commissioner for Internal Market and Services said: “The European Union is rich in products based on traditional knowledge and production methods, which are often rooted in the cultural and social heritage of a particular geographical location, from Bohemian crystal and Scottish tartans to Carrara marble to Tapisserie d’Aubusson.”

He added that protecting these kinds of goods with GIs could offer economic benefits to SMEs and boost Europe’s regions.

“This could help preserve our unique and diverse heritage, whilst making a significant contribution to European jobs and growth.”

At the moment, EU-wide GI protection is only available for agricultural products such as cheeses, wines, meats, and fruits and vegetables from a specific place that have certain qualities or which are made according to traditional methods. Non-agricultural products such as ceramics, marble, cutlery, shoes, tapestries, and musical instruments are not protected by GIs beyond national laws.

The Commission says that 14 EU member states have laws on GI protection for non-agricultural products. This lack of harmonisation means that non-agricultural producers who wish to protect a GI in the EU need to file for protection in each of those countries.

The EU’s consultation will be running until October 28.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article