House of Commons approves IP bill

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

House of Commons approves IP bill

Changes to UK patent, copyright and design law look likely to come into effect, after the IP bill was passed in the House of Commons

David Willetts

The third reading of the bill took place on March 12. On April 2 it will now return to the House of Lords, which is likely to endorse the changes made. Once that stage is completed, the bill can receive royal assent and become law.

The most controversial aspect of the bill is the introduction of criminal penalties for infringing registered designs.

MPs approved this reform, but limited it by agreeing to insert the word “intentionally” in several places.

They also rejected a proposal to extend the criminal penalties to unregistered design rights.

The bill also provides the necessary foundations for the UK to sign the Unified Patent Court Agreement.

Closing the short and good-natured debate in the House of Commons, Minister for Universities and Science David Willetts (pictured) said: “I am not sure that I would describe the Bill as thin. I would certainly call it a slim but well-proportioned and effective Bill.”

The full text of the bill is available online.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article