Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Twitter has received a letter from IBM accusing it of infringing at least three IBM patents just days before the social networking site's Initial Public Offering

The allegation was revealed by Twitter in an S-1 filing used by companies to register their assets with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the letter sent by IBM, the technology company invited Twitter's executives "to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations".

The patents in question are US Patent No 6,957,224, which covers the efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators; No 7,072,849, which protects a method for presenting advertising in an interactive service; and No 7,099,862, which relates to programmatic discovery of common contacts.

In filing, Twitter admits that its IP portfolio is smaller than that of many of its competitors, and notes that NPEs "often attempt to aggressively assert claims in order to extract value from technology companies".

But the company says of the IBM letter: "We believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM's allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us".

Despite the accusation, Twitter said in the SEC filing that it plans to offer its stock for between $23 and $25 a share - up from the previous asking price of between $17 and $20. The increase values the company at $17 billion, compared to the previous valuation of $11 billion.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Gift this article