Rockstar sues companies including Google for infringing Nortel patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Rockstar sues companies including Google for infringing Nortel patents

The Rockstar consortium, which bought the Nortel patent portfolio for $4.5 billion, has sued cell phone manufacturers as well as Google for patent infringement

Along with another company, Netstar, the consortium, which is owned by Apple, Microsoft, BlackBerry, Sony and Ericsson, filed the lawsuits at the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Thursday. Rockstar and Netstar are claiming Google willfully infringed the patents and are asking for a jury trial.

Google is accused of infringing seven patents relating to technology which matches internet search terms with relevant advertising.

In addition to Google, Rockstar is also suing companies including Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, LG, HTC, Pantech, and ASUSTeK in separate lawsuits.

The Nortel patents were put up for auction in July 2011 after the company went into bankruptcy proceedings. Rockstar was given clearance by the Department of Justice to buy the portfolio after agreeing to license the patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

Google placed a starting bid of $900 million for the patents and increased its bid several times, eventually offering $4.4 billion. After losing out to Rockstar, Google purchased Motorola for $12 billion. Google agreed to license the Motorola patents on FRAND terms, but was sued by Microsoft in November last year for allegedly demanding “excessive and discriminatory” royalties.

In the case, Rockstar Consortium US and Netstar Technologies v Google, Rockstar and Netstar are represented by Susman Godfrey.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article