Rockstar sues companies including Google for infringing Nortel patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rockstar sues companies including Google for infringing Nortel patents

The Rockstar consortium, which bought the Nortel patent portfolio for $4.5 billion, has sued cell phone manufacturers as well as Google for patent infringement

Along with another company, Netstar, the consortium, which is owned by Apple, Microsoft, BlackBerry, Sony and Ericsson, filed the lawsuits at the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Thursday. Rockstar and Netstar are claiming Google willfully infringed the patents and are asking for a jury trial.

Google is accused of infringing seven patents relating to technology which matches internet search terms with relevant advertising.

In addition to Google, Rockstar is also suing companies including Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, LG, HTC, Pantech, and ASUSTeK in separate lawsuits.

The Nortel patents were put up for auction in July 2011 after the company went into bankruptcy proceedings. Rockstar was given clearance by the Department of Justice to buy the portfolio after agreeing to license the patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

Google placed a starting bid of $900 million for the patents and increased its bid several times, eventually offering $4.4 billion. After losing out to Rockstar, Google purchased Motorola for $12 billion. Google agreed to license the Motorola patents on FRAND terms, but was sued by Microsoft in November last year for allegedly demanding “excessive and discriminatory” royalties.

In the case, Rockstar Consortium US and Netstar Technologies v Google, Rockstar and Netstar are represented by Susman Godfrey.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article