Dot-sport decision sparks controversy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Dot-sport decision sparks controversy

Famous Four Media, an applicant for the gTLD .sport, has lost a determination based on community rights under Icann’s new gTLD programme

In a decision published this week and dated October 23, panellist Guido Tawil upheld a complaint filed by SportAccord (which has a competing application for .sport).

SportAccord claimed to be an established international representative institution of the sport community, comprising 107 international sports federations and other organisations.

It argued that the sport community was targeted by Famous Four’s .sport gTLD and that the community’s rights and legitimate interests would suffer material detriment.

Tawil decided that, even though SportAccord may not represent the entire sports community “it acts for a preponderant part of such community” and that its membership “is accessible to any organization” complying with its minimum standards.

He also found that the sport community “is a community that clearly distinguishes itself from other communities by its characteristics, objectives and values and is therefore “clearly delineated”.

Famous Four, based in Gibraltar, has applied to run 61 gTLDs. In a statement, the company said the decision “strikes right at the heart of the concept of freedom of expression” and confirms concerns that “the community objection process could be hijacked by competing applicants”.

“Famous Four Media is disappointed that the Panellist fails entirely to take into account that he objector is a competing applicant merely trying to game the system, and avoid the more rigid scrutiny of the Community Priority Evaluation process,” it added.

So far, nine community objections have been determined. As Managing IP recently reported, a complaint filed by the US Polo Association against Ralph Lauren’s application for .polo was upheld.

A complaint against an applications for .architect has been successful but complaints against .fly, .gay, .halal, .islam, persiangulf, .reisen and .shop were all rejected.

For more comment on the .sport case, see blog posts on The Domains, Domain Incite and Domain Name Wire.

According to the determination, neither party used outside counsel in the case.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Patrick Ogola joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss helping African entrepreneurs on the global stage, and explains why young lawyers should speak up
Heli Pihlajamaa, the EPO’s principal director for patent law and procedures, joins us to take stock of the unitary patent following its second anniversary
Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Gift this article