Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Bill aims to solve USPTO funding crisis

A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives that would finally end the diversion of USPTO fees away from the agency

HR3349 – To provide for the permanent funding of the USPTO, and for other purposes, was sponsored by Rep John Conyers and three other Representatives on October 28 and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Under the proposal, a revolving fund would be created in which USPTO fee revenues would be deposited. Revenues would be solely for use by the Office, and it would no longer be subject to the annual appropriations process.

Hopes that the America Invents Act would solve the USPTO’s funding problems have come to naught so far. Sequestration has led to hundreds of millions of dollars being diverted from the USPTO to other government work.

In an interview published in the AIPLA Daily Report last week, USPTO Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea said sequestration is “likely to have long-term negative implications across all parts” of the USPTO, meaning that patent backlog and pendency will increase.

Stanek Rea said the Agency planned to hire 750 new examiners in each of 2014 and 2015 to cope with the growing number of patent applications. Thanks to sequestration, it has halted most hiring, cut some outreach and education work and delayed moving into permanent space in the satellite offices in Dallas, Denver and Silicon Valley. It has also had to cut back on IT developments.

Welcoming the latest bill, AIPLA Executive Director Q Todd Dickinson said: “The time has come for Congress to provide the USPTO with the ability to do the work its customers pay for by ending the possibility of fee diversion, once and for all.”

During a Congressional hearing on the Innovation Act on Tuesday, former USPTO Director David Kappos also welcomed the Conyers bill.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP boutique Petillion represented Ikea in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome.
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
The firm’s recent IP hire and launch of a new robotics industry group signal an effort to capture work emerging from AI entering the physical world
Another firm sets up shop in Dallas, bringing its patent disputes capabilities to one of the US’s busiest litigation venues
Entrepreneurial IP lawyers are still launching specialist firms, but increasingly with larger teams, broader coverage and greater infrastructure than the boutique model once implied
Jevon Louis explains how Covid led to a focus on local clients, discusses why mediation is successful in Singapore and reflects on the growing demand for AI advice
An increase in instructions from domestic companies and litigation for international clients are driving success for the Chinese IP firm, according to two lead partners
Ankur Sangal said he wants his team, nearly 30-strong already, to respond to a growing demand for specialist, commercially focused IP advice in a ‘rapidly evolving’ Indian market
As AI adoption accelerates across corporate IP departments, Simon Webster, president of IP at Clarivate, argues that success will depend less on technology alone and more on data quality, workflow design, and organisational readiness
Gift this article