UK Supreme Court defines “makes” in Schütz v Werit
13 March 2013
|
James Nurton, London
After three judgments over nearly five years in the Schütz v Werit dispute, we now finally know what is meant by the word “makes” in the UK Patents Act 1977
In a decision today, the UK Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal, finding that providing replacement bottles for crates did not amount to patent infringement. The ruling could have implications in cases involving other consumable goods, such as ink...
Please
log in to read the rest of this article.
New to Managing Intellectual Property? Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Already registered?
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Log in
Join us now
Gain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now. Join here