Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Yesterday an injunction against adidas over trainers that use a knitted upper was lifted in Germany. The dispute, brought by Nike, could start a series of patent cases in the sportswear industry

The Nike European patent concerns a shoe with a meltable polymer material used in its knitted upper. The technology is used in the Nike Flyknit shoe, melting the knitted yarn together to add reinforcement to the knitted construction, which makes it seamless and very light.

Adidas adizero primeknit upper

The adiZero Primeknit shoe, which was the subject of the suit, was launched later but had been in production for three years, according to adidas. Pictured is the one-piece upper of the shoe.

The Nuremberg district court lifted an ex parte injunction won by Nike on September 24. Adidas had succeeded in stopping the enforcement of the injunction on October 10.

The case is unusual because sportswear companies are rarely involved in patent suits, despite often owning hundreds of patents over their products.

"That is changing now, as the market becomes more driven by technologies such as this, rather than straight design," comments a lawyer close to the case. "Sportswear increasingly uses advanced materials, chemical compounds and technology built into the products."

It is likened to the automobile industry in Germany, which is rarely the subject of patent cases. Most disputes are settled, end in cross-licensing or "the infringement is merely tolerated",says the lawyer.

Bardehle Pagenberg is representing adidas in the case and Wragge & Co and Prinz & Partner are representing Nike.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article