Comment: Why Google tops list of IP's most influential

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Comment: Why Google tops list of IP's most influential

Managing IP's 10th-anniversary list of the most influential people in IP sees Google's Larry Page at number one. Do you agree?

Picking the Top 50 list of the most influential people in IP is never easy. Influence on what? Where? And over what period? Can a big influence in one area, of IP or the world, ever compare with a broader role? Generally in our Top 50 - which we have been running for 10 years now - we prioritise individuals with a core influence, no matter how narrow their remit, and focus on those who will have an impact in the coming months and years.

Some choices are easy. Google has been in the middle of so many pivotal IP disputes across patents, trade marks and copyright that it could qualify for the list three times over. But rather than select three different in-house counsel – or just Fred von Lohmann, as we did last year – we decided to list founder Larry Page. For while challenging IP conventions was never his stated aim, developing such innovative online business models made it inevitable. If you want to scan all the books ever published or photograph every house in the world, you're going to bump up against rights issues.

Putting Page at number one was slightly more controversial, but we think the scope of the issues the company is involved in – also taking in keyword advertising, software copyright, smartphone wars and political lobbying – justified the elevation. Please let us know if you disagree.

Apple was a different proposition, for while the company has been at the heart of smartphone litigation worldwide and notable trade mark cases, several others have shared that influence. More interesting is that so many of the Apple cases involve design rights or user-interface patents – rather than the hidden technologies of networks and servers that have been central to other recent telecoms litigation. British designer Sir Jonathan Ive, therefore, makes our list for his influential product design. As Judge Colin Birss (also listed) said in a recent case, the designs of Apple's competitors are just "not as cool".

Ranking the top 10 individuals in order is a first for Managing IP, but we think it lends some interesting emphasis to those companies, judges, office heads and politicians. Look out too for the five awards given to individuals outside that top 10.

As mentioned we are interested to hear your thoughts on the list, which you can make either in comments to the articles online, or on our LinkedIn or Twitter pages (#MIP50).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
Gift this article