IP filings surge ahead of economic growth
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP filings surge ahead of economic growth

Patent and trade mark filings rose 7.2% and 11.8% respectively in 2010, far ahead of global GDP growth at 5.1%, according to WIPO’s annual statistics report

Much of this increase is due to China, whose patent applications rose 24.3% and trade mark applications 29.8%. Without China, the rise in patent numbers almost halves to 3.7%.

But the recovery from 2009 is still impressive – using the same ex-China model, patent filings fell almost 6% that year. “The strength of IP growth around the world was unexpected given the still stuttering economy,” said senior WIPO statistical analyst Mosahid Khan.

"We were particularly surprised at how strong the US patent recovery was, given the difficulties of its economy.” Patent applications did not grow at all in the US in 2009, but rose 7.5% in 2010.

WIPO has made an effort to be more up to date with its statistics this year. The World IP Indicators report for 2008 came out in September 2010. By moving a little later to December in 2011, the Office has managed to jump a year ahead and report on 2010 numbers.

Worldwide patent filings growth rate (%)

2007

2008

2009

2010

With China

4

2.7

-3.6

7.2

Without China

2.4

0.3

-5.8

3.7

WIPO has gone to greater lengths to generate statistics in other areas, including on patent pendency times. According to Khan, this is one reason that the WIPO report says that pendency times have increased in recent years, but the number of pending applications has declined. While the latter information came from IP offices, WIPO generated the former post-grant, by looking at granted patents and then searching back to when the application was made.

It is also worth noting that the figure for pending patent applications does not include China, which doesn’t publish this information. In recent years, SIPO has been granting patents at a slower rate than the US and Japan. Those two offices accounted for 80% of the growth in the number of granted patents in 2010.

Among other results from the report, Japan’s patent filing continued to shrink in 2010, though at a lesser rate than in 2009. Khan points out that there are many dynamics at work here, including an increasing use of the PCT system by Japanese patent applicants and an increase in the number of claims per patent.

WIPO receives some information from 88 IP offices for patents, out of a possible 135, and 115 for trade marks out of 169. Those missing offices are among the smallest though, giving data coverage of 97% and 87% respectively.

The full report can be seen here.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Nghiem Xuan Bac Pham, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Speakers at an INTA event weighed in on why firms should create AI use policies and how they stay on top of the latest developments
The England and Wales Court of Appeal backed Lidl in its trademark dispute with Tesco, but we should pay more attention to how we rule on first-instance decisions
Gift this article