Are you ready for 3D printing?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Are you ready for 3D printing?

IP owners need to rethink the way that they exploit and enforce their IP rights if they want to meet the challenges of a technology that could revolutionise manufacturing

For now, 3D printers are the stuff of garage hobbyists and corporate R&D labs. But industry analysts say they could transform the way that products are made and distributed, just as the internet shook up the entertainment and music industries.

"Three-dimensional printing is something that's both nothing new and completely new", says Gareth Stokes, a lawyer with DLA Piper. "It has always been possible to take a real world object and make a copy, for example by simply casting a mould. But what 3D printing does is make that process massively easier and cheaper."

Wider access to this ability to copy, both in industry and the home, will be the source of new issues for IP owners, he says.

This month's edition of Managing IP takes an in-depth look at the legal challenges and business opportunities that 3D printing presents. It outlines the IP rights that businesses can use to protect their products from unauthorised copying and provides a five-step guide to planning an effective strategy.

These include strengthening your IP armoury to maximise protection against would-be infringers. One tactic is for rights owners to embed their trade marks into the surface of products susceptible to unauthorised copying. Although it would not enable IP owners to prevent rivals from creating reverse-engineered parts that lacked the trade mark, it would give them greater legal ammunition against anyone selling exact duplicates of their products.

IP owners should also rethink their business models. One way to do this is to look for innovative ways to make the 3D files that allow their products to be printed and use them to generate revenue. Manufacturers should consider coming together to create a parts store, similar to the iTunes model, which allows consumers an easy way to search for and print out spare parts for a small fee. For manufacturers, this means they still have an income stream from spares with no costs of manufacture, transportation or storage.

You can read more in the November issue of Managing IP. If you are not a subscriber, you can access the contents by taking out a free trial.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article