InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Mexico: Strengthening the PPH

Since March 1 2011, when the Mexican Institute of the Industrial Property (IMPI) established with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a pilot programme for the Patent Prosecution Highway, the trend has continued with different offices.

The Spanish Office of Patents and Trademarks (OEPM) joined a three-year pilot programme which concludes on October 1 2014; the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) began a two-year pilot programme on July 1 2012 and extended it up to June 30 2017; the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) initiated a programme on October 18 2012 and made it permanent on February 29 2012; China signed through its office a pilot programme in February 2013 and extended this to an indefinite term; Singapore signed a pilot programme for two years which expires on June 10 2015; and the most recent partner has been with Canada, which began a two-year pilot programme on January 6 2014.

All these countries tend to extend their programmes permanently as they are convinced of the benefits of an expeditious, inexpensive and high-quality examination, avoiding duplicative work and reducing the examination workload in patent prosecution.

Thus, the number of cases under this means of prosecution continues to increase; there were 84 applications in 2012 when the USPTO, JPO and OEPM participated and this number has increaed to 213 in 2013, when the KIPO, SIPO and IPOS signed this programme with Mexico. In this year, an important increase in this means prosecution is expected considering the signature with Canada.

The benefits have to be evaluated regarding the urgency for grant, the documents available, and cost for translation, and in some cases the PPH might be extremely convenient.

Georgina Flores

Olivares & Cia
Pedro Luis Ogazón No 17
Col San Angel
01000 México DF
Tel: +5255 53 22 30 00
Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01



Managing IP


ManagingIP profile

Federal Circuit’s Brunetti ruling: barring immoral or scandalous marks is unconstitutional restriction of free spee…

Dec 15 2017 10:12 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

Federal Circuit rules in Amgen v Sandoz on remand from SCOTUS

Dec 14 2017 09:58 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

RT @mdloney: Canada moves closer to joining the Hague Agreement with the release of proposed new Industrial Design Regulations

Dec 12 2017 10:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog

null null null

null null null

End of Year 2017

Tribal sovereign immunity: Taking a wrecking ball to the IPR system

The lawyer behind Allergan’s controversial transfer of patents to a Native American tribe says others are “lining up to do deals”. But, Michael Loney asks, will the PTAB rule that sovereign immunity applies in these types of deals?

Most read articles